Search for: "Bath Inc." Results 141 - 160 of 443
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2013, 3:55 am by John Day
 The responding officer was attacked by a man at the home who had allegedly been using bath salts for several days. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 11:00 pm
The Flair models were sold from January 2008 through February 2017 for between $230 and $250.Importer(s):TOMY International Inc., of Oak Brook, IllinoisManufactured In:ChinaRecall number:23-272# # #Looks like TOMY also fell off its pedestal with this recall. [read post]
27 Oct 2018, 10:00 pm
ENTHONE, INC., came out from the Court of Appeal of the Federal Circuit (CAFC) last Friday, and reminded me of a good tip: include evidence in the record to show that the claims relate to an unpredictable art. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 4:13 am
After taking a morning bath in his room, the plaintiff attempted to use the grab bar to lift himself from the tub. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:14 am
Applicant relied on In re Princeton Tectonics, Inc., 95 USPQ2d 1509 (TTAB 2010) wherein the Board reversed a Section 2(d) refusal based on a determination that “personal headlamps” were unrelated to “lighting fixtures. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 3:15 pm
The plaintiff says that the hotel franchisers are to blame for the injury because there were no bath mats or slip-preventing pads placed on the shower floor. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 11:00 pm
The Flair models were sold from January 2008 through February 2017 for between $230 and $250.Importer(s):TOMY International Inc., of Oak Brook, IllinoisManufactured In:ChinaRecall number:23-272# # #Looks like TOMY also fall off its pedestal with this product recall. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm by News Desk
Barga, president of Judge Farms Inc., on May 17 and posted it for public viewing in recent days. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 6:56 pm by support
Sunbeam Products Inc. has issued a defective product recall for about 600,000 Mr. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 2:23 am by John L. Welch
Persona Parfum, Inc., Cancellation No. 9204830 (June 30, 2010) [precedential].Standing: Toufigh contended that his application to register ECSTASY for bath products was refused registration in view of the subject registration. [read post]