Search for: "Battle v. Georgia" Results 141 - 160 of 442
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2013, 7:30 am by Guest Blogger
Georgia in 1969, holding that the private possession of obscenity could not constitutionally be prohibited. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
Georgia Regional Hospital. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Federalist Society Review, Richard Raile argues that last term’s decision in partisan-gerrymandering case Gill v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 7:27 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
Also at this blog, Ronald Collins previews Adam Liptak’s newly released e-book, To Have and Uphold: The Supreme Court and the Battle for Same-Sex Marriage, which presents a narrative of the same-sex marriage cases the Court decided two weeks ago – United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 9:46 am
A Georgia Appeals Court ruled in March 2008, that the SuSu character could be based on Stewart (Stewart v. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 8:22 pm by Anthony Gaughan
In overturning the notorious case of Plessy v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 12:07 pm
 In Georgia, a surviving spouse has the right to a certain amount of property from the estate of a decedent. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 7:52 am
  On the other hand, that deeper consideration will, itself, make universities less attractive targets for litigation, which seems to be the chosen weapon in the battle to narrow educational fair use. [read post]
4 May 2017, 10:55 am by Robin Frazer Clark
Here is the law of Georgia that the trial judge will read to the jury regarding expert witnesses: Continue reading → [read post]
4 May 2017, 10:55 am by Robin Frazer Clark
Here is the law of Georgia that the trial judge will read to the jury regarding expert witnesses: Continue reading → [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 5:48 am by David Hansen, JD
Public.Resource.Org and the Official Code of Georgia Annotated Later this week an organization called Public.Resource.Org will ask the Supreme Court to address the scope of public access and use rights in “the law”, specifically in a case titled Georgia v. [read post]