Search for: "Bausch "
Results 141 - 160
of 358
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2016, 7:26 am
NAD Rules on Bausch & Lomb Ultra Contact Lens Claims The National Advertising Division (“NAD”) has recommended that Bausch & Lomb Inc. stop making certain representations about its line of Ultra contact lenses, but that other claims about certain chemical properties of Ultra lenses were supported by evidence. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 11:00 am
(Bausch! [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 1:20 pm
It refused to follow Bausch, a decision that we’ve criticized here before. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 5:00 am
The district court (like the Seventh Circuit in Bausch) gave the plaintiff a pass on TwIqbal pleading standards. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 9:43 am
., Bausch & Lomb and Delaware North Cos. [read post]
20 May 2011, 7:25 am
Anthony Ikwueme socializing with VALLers Regent Law Library's Nikki Powell and Teresa Parker-BellamyFred Dingledy from William & Mary's Law LibraryDonna Bausch and David Knight from the Norfolk Law LibraryMany thanks to Bill Magee who took the photos and to Donna Bausch for coordinating the effort. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 6:04 am
Bausch & Lomb, Inc., 2009 WL 4287706 (Sept. 25, 2009 D.S.C.)In re Bausch & Lomb, Inc. [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 7:21 am
Here's an example according to the American Association for Justice: Bausch & Lomb has settled more than 600 contact lens solution cases in the last year. [read post]
10 May 2011, 9:26 am
Just look at the Bausch (Bausch v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 6:22 am
James Werner Award honors a member who has made a significant contribution to serving or to arranging for services to be provided to persons with disabilities, or for distinctive service by a person with a disability.Awards Committee 2016-2017 members:Chair, Elizabeth Caulfield, Assistant Law Librarian II, California Court of Appeal, Second DistrictMember, Donna Bausch, Law Librarian, Norfolk Law Library Member, Paula Doty, formerly of… [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 10:41 pm
Thorsten Bausch and Bernd KrögerIf a patent only provides the skilled person with a general scientific explanation as to why the procedure disclosed therein is suitable for the purpose in question and does not disclose a new technical teaching in relation to this purpose, but merely a discovery of biological correlations, then this is insufficient to acknowledge novelty (continuation of BGH, judgment of 9 June 2011 – X ZR 68/08, GRUR 2011, 999 marginal 44 – Memantine). [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 7:03 am
Bausch & Lomb, Inc., 2-10-cv-02273 (TNWD January 20, 2011, Order) (McCalla, J.) [read post]
25 Dec 2019, 3:11 am
Thorsten Bausch and Marie ThomsonThe appeal on a point of law, for which no leave was granted by the Federal Patent Court, was held admissible, because the grounds of appeal under §100 III 3 and 6 PatG were invoked. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 6:41 am
If not, expect a summary affirmance or a further remand back to the district court.Also of interest to those playing in our sandbox, the Supreme Court also denied certiorari in the infamous Bausch medical device pleading (TwIqbal) case.Here's the list containing both orders. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 4:26 pm
Thorsten Bausch and Elke PerschHoffmann Eitle A technical teaching making use of a discovery, e.g. of a natural law, for achieving a particular result is patent-eligible, irrespective of whether or not it has an “inventive excess” beyond the purposeful exploitation of the natural law. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 10:57 am
Want to guess who wrote the Bausch opinion? [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 1:46 pm
To the best of my knowledge, neither Bausch and Lomb nor AMO has tried a single case. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 1:46 pm
To the best of my knowledge, neither Bausch and Lomb nor AMO has tried a single case. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:15 am
A normal (statistically) patent filings week saw 29 new Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) proceedings (including a pair of post grant reviews) and 67 district court patent complaints, with another 76 terminations. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:15 am
A normal (statistically) patent filings week saw 29 new Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) proceedings (including a pair of post grant reviews) and 67 district court patent complaints, with another 76 terminations. [read post]
