Search for: "Bd. of Educ. of the City of New York v. State"
Results 141 - 160
of 167
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2010, 3:21 am
Bd. of Educ. for Tonawanda City School District, 96 NY2d 271, the Commissioner dismissed Dickinson’s appeal. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 11:20 am
Further, public policy limitations on arbitrability are rare and "almost invariably" involve a nondelegable constitutional or statutory duty (Matter of Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of N.Y. v New York State Pub. [read post]
24 May 2010, 6:07 pm
New York City Bd. of Ed., 2010 WL 2010462 (E.D.N.Y. [read post]
13 May 2010, 12:39 am
”As the current dispute depends on the interpretation of the CBA's no-layoff clause in order to determine whether that provision is applicable to the Village's action in abolishing six firefighters' positions, the court ruled that this was an issue that the parties agreed to submit to arbitration.Thus, said the court, Supreme Court properly determined that the parties' substantive disagreement as to the meaning and application of the no-layoff clause is to be resolved by… [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 6:32 pm
The Southern District of New York stated that it was “awarding [the defendant] its fees pursuant to 17 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 11:19 pm
Chronic health problems may not constitute a disability within the meaning of ADA or the State’s Human Rights LawSirota v NYC Bd. of Ed., App. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:15 am
A policy decision by the employer is not subject to "pre-negotiations;" the impact of that decision on unit members is negotiableMatter of County of Erie & Erie County Sheriff v State of New York Pub. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 5:18 am
Bd of Educ of New York City 49 IDELR 255 (S.D. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 2:26 am
A New York City schoolteacher served with disciplinary charges pursuant to Section 3020-a of the Education Law served a subpoena duces tecum [produce the documents] on the New York City Board of Education requiring it to produce certain records. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 6:44 am
Source: New York Legislative Retrieval System (LRS), Search run September 20, 2009. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 4:54 am
Bd. of Educ. (1943). [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 4:15 am
A New York City schoolteacher served with disciplinary charges pursuant to Section 3020-a of the Education Law served a subpoena duces tecum [produce the documents] on the New York City Board of Education requiring it to produce certain records. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 11:45 am
U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, February 17, 2009 New York State Restaurant Ass'n v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 4:30 am
A policy decision by the employer is not subject to "pre-negotiations;" the impact of that decision on unit members is negotiableMatter of County of Erie & Erie County Sheriff v State of New York Pub. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 9:58 am
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, CONSUMER PROTECTION LAW, FOOD & BEVERAGES, HEALTH LAW New York State Restaurant Ass'n v. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 4:10 am
This was the point made by the court in Levine v New York City Transit Authority, 70 AD2d 900, affirmed 49 NY2d 747. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 1:01 am
Bd. of Ed. of City of New York. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:29 pm
New York State Bd. of Elections, No. 07-5367 In a challenge to state law prohibiting the use of absentee ballots in elections for county committee members brought under the First Amendment, grant of summary judgment for defendant state board of elections is reversed where: 1) the arguments proffered by the State are so extraordinarily weak that they cannot justify the burdens imposed by Election Law section 7-122; and 2) the district… [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 3:31 pm
Bd. of Education of City of New York, No. 064715p.pdf "The question of whether a biological and non-custodial parent of a disabled child has standing to sue under the Individuals with Disabilities Act, is certified where plaintiff's standing turns on a question of New York law that has not been addressed by the New York Court of Appeals. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 7:18 pm
New York City Bd of Educ 465 F.3d 503, 46 IDELR 181 (2d Cir. 10/12/2006), the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit was presented with the school district's argument that partial implementation of IEPs constituted the necessary "substantial compliance" required by IDEA. [read post]
