Search for: "Bear v. United States of America"
Results 141 - 160
of 968
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
The development of the birth control pill, which was first available in the United States in 1960, meant that women could engage in sexual activity with at least some protection against unwanted pregnancy. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 6:15 am
– had no bearing on Ali’s conviction. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 3:32 pm
[VDARE partly complied with the subpoena, but later sued] in United States District Court for the Northern District of New York … [VDARE Foundation, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 4:14 pm
§ 1595a(c)(1)(A), which says, "Merchandise which is introduced or attempted to be introduced into the United States contrary to law shall be ... seized and forfeited if it is stolen, smuggled, or clandestinely imported or introduced." [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 5:01 am
First, Adams' understanding of the right to bear arms is fundamentally incompatible with New York's assertions in NYSRPA v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 9:04 pm
On June 26, 2013, when the Supreme Court decided the case of United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
The state and its instrumentalities tend to be risk averse--the essence of the ideology of compliance based governmentality. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 1:53 am
See, e.g., Air Transport Ass'n of America v. [read post]
16 May 2017, 8:03 am
" Speaking in the Pentagon, after swearing in his Secretary of Defense, with the Vice President standing over his shoulder, the President was speaking about “keep[ing] radical Islamic terrorists out of the United States of America. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 7:05 am
Barr, an effort by Clemente Pereida, who has lived in the United States without authorization for nearly 25 years, to avoid mandatory deportation by presenting evidence to an immigration judge that his deportation would cause exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to his United States citizen son. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 6:30 am
It is The Constitution of the United States of America: Analysis and Interpretation. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
NARA v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
There was no relevant federal law, nor any attempt to apply federal constitutional principles to bear on the validity of those state bans. [read post]
31 May 2011, 6:37 pm
News America Marketing In-Store, Inc., United States District Court for Minnesota, Civil No. 04-4213, to collect damages and seek injunctive relief for, inter alia, alleged violations of federal and state antitrust laws, unfair competition, and federal and state disparagement laws. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:23 pm
JAMES MADISON, SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE UNITED STATES.SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES5 U.S. 137; 2 L. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 2:50 am
City of Philadelphia, Medina v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 7:40 am
Attorney Preet Bharara brought the seizure and forfeiture action of United States Of America v. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 9:04 pm
In Wisconsin v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:38 am
Simply put, Section 5 stated that if any jurisdiction wanted to make changes to laws relevant to voting, it first must have that aspiration upheld by the authority of the Attorney General of the United States or a three judge panel of the U.S. [read post]
5 May 2010, 7:13 pm
It is worth noting that in the recent United States Supreme Court case of District of Columbia v. [read post]
