Search for: "Beck v. The Government" Results 141 - 160 of 289
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2013, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Stein of Bilzin Sumberg on the firm’s blog, Mortgage Crisis Watch Construction Contract Requires Written Invoice Before Owner Must Pay Contractor: Kasinecz v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 5:58 am by Amy Howe
Beck previews the argument in Sandifer v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 7:20 am by Amy Howe
In the second case, Kaley v. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  ONY has nothing to do with the FDA, or even the federal government. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Nussbaum (1) Bernard-Henry Lévy (3) Bert Parks (1) Bertrand Russell (1) Bessie Smith (1) Best of the Web (7) bestiality (14) Beta Rube (1) betamax3000 (18) Beth (the commenter) (9) Bette Davis (14) Bette Midler (1) Betty Friedan (8) Betty White (1) Beyonce (18) Bhutan (2) Bianca Jagger (1) Bible (40) Biddy Martin (13) biden (177) Biden gaffes (21) Biff (1) big and small (5) Big Government sounds like a creepy stalker (10) Big Hollywood (1) Big Mike (1) bigotry (22) biking (160)… [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:32 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
Johns River Water Management District, in which the Court held that the government must show a nexus and rough proportionality between its demand on the landowner and the effects of the proposed land use whenever it engages in land-use regulation, while Ronald Mann analyzes the Court’s opinion in Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 7:24 pm by Ron Coleman
For three years — from October 2006 through December 2009 — while I was a partner at Jones Day, I co-hosted the Drug and Device Law Blog with Jim Beck, of Dechert. [read post]
21 May 2013, 7:49 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
At The Originalism Blog, Michael Rappaport analyzes the government’s cert. petition in National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 4:07 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has accepted an appeal in the case of Tincher v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 4:30 am
The Court of Appeals explained that a residency policy for municipal workers serves "the legitimate purpose of encouraging city employees to maintain a commitment and involvement with the government which employs them by living within the city [citations omitted]. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 10:09 am by Brian Shiffrin
  And I'm not the only one saying that.Even the request to search an individual is governed by the DeBour/Hollman line of cases. [read post]