Search for: "Bentley v. Bentley" Results 141 - 160 of 231
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2024, 4:00 am by Adam Dodek
Other tributes noted his participation in the landmark case of Halpern v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 2:00 am by Stefanie Levine
Here is the latest installment of Reexamination Requests from Scott Daniels, of Reexamination Alert and Practice Center Contributor… In January, the company Effectively Illuminated Pathways, LLC. sued Aston Martin of North America, Bentley and Volkswagen of America (Bentley’s parent company) for infringement of U.S. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 2:00 am by Stefanie Levine
Here is the latest installment of Reexamination Requests from Scott Daniels, of Reexamination Alert and Practice Center Contributor… In January, the company Effectively Illuminated Pathways, LLC. sued Aston Martin of North America, Bentley and Volkswagen of America (Bentley’s parent company) for infringement of U.S. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 2:42 pm by Ken White
Hepps, 475 U.S. 767, 768–69, 106 S.Ct. 1558, 1559, 89 L.Ed.2d 783 (1986) (private figure); Bentley v. [read post]
1 Jan 2013, 5:42 pm
  According to reports, the jury award ranks as the third largest ever in a patent case beating out the Apple v Samsung jury award last summer (see this post by Merpel as reproduced in LegalWeek). [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 6:19 am by Joel R. Brandes
[Germany ] [Habitual Residence] In Hamprecht v Hamprecht, 2012 WL 1890857 (M.D.Fla.) [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 6:29 pm
 For those who can make it, the online pre-program is available via Zoom:ç Online Pre-program ALGORITHMIC LAW AND SOCIETY SYMPOSIUMWEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2021; 3.30.pm – 5.00pmChair: Pedro Rubim Borges Fortes, UFRJPaper: “Regulation and Human Rights in ASEAN’s Smart Cities Network: Promise and the Perils”, Alice de Jonge (Monash University)Paper: “Toward A Practical Legal Rule… [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 9:32 am
Bentley Issue: Whether, under the Sixth Amendment, a child's report of sexual abuse to a hospital counselor is "testimonial" and thus subject to cross-examination if the interview serves both therapeutic and investigatory purposes. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 3:35 am by Kelly
Highlights this week included: CAFC nixes 25% ‘rule of thumb’ application for estimating patent damages: Uniloc v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 6:56 pm by Gene Takagi
First, we heard closing args in the Fairbairn v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
In Thompson v Cardel Homes Limited Partnership, 2014 ABCA 242, the Alberta Court of Appeal again affirmed this principle, but in different circumstances. [read post]