Search for: "Best v. Perry"
Results 141 - 160
of 476
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2016, 4:51 pm
Finally, directors should be wary of blindly following strong leaders who seek to try to pack the board with friends, family, and directors whom they can otherwise influence or control. [3] Directors have an obligation to stand up to “strong man” executives when his or her actions would not be in the bank’s best interests. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 10:18 am
The post Perry Escapes Felony Indictment via Bush v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 12:09 pm
Bank of the United States v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 2:00 am
See Starrs v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 6:52 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 8:34 am
“ Lozano v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 1:07 pm
V, § 3(b)(10), Fla. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 9:30 am
The US Supreme Court, in Obergefell v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 1:34 am
Never Too Late 67 [week ending on Sunday 11 October] – Eponia rumours | Batmobile and copyright | EPO and human rights | Gucci v Guess | NOCN (Formerly National Open College Network) v Open College Network Credit4Learning | New CJEU reference on linking and copyright | Viennese waltz may be the last dance for Board members | Richard Perry v F H Brundle & Others | Safe harbour and the Schrems case |… [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 3:40 am
But Graham v. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 6:01 am
At its best, judicial humour will be intended to have, and will achieve, a positive effect on courtroom proceedings and on participants. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 12:39 am
In a blunt dissent in Genesis Healthcare v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 8:41 am
Ferrer, Perry v. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 7:05 am
V, § 15, Fla. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 2:07 pm
Doesn’t think we should change Roe v. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 5:01 pm
Again, there's much to said for this as a means for maintaining social peace, albeit at the cost of accepting the maintenance of what many might consider significant injustice in some of the states.But note well that what Scalia and Alito are doing is really reviving the theory of "popular sovereignty" best identified with the Little Giant Sen. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 5:16 pm
Baker v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Perry. [read post]
29 May 2015, 7:08 am
The case is significant to the extent that it provides parents guidance on the location of their post-divorce domicile and is yet another case that illustrates the concept of joint custody.In Eickelberg v Eickelberg, the parents were awarded joint legal custody. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 11:05 am
In Winsdor and Hollingsworth v. [read post]
