Search for: "Biggers v. Biggers"
Results 141 - 160
of 2,806
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2016, 9:12 pm
Supreme Court ruling in Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 2:02 pm
v=hMak8hayBOs [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 4:18 am
The Third Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that a Medicare recipient could not prevent CMS from recovering conditional payments from a liability settlement by holding that the NJ Collateral Source Statute (NJCSS) did not prevent Medicare from recovering medical expenses as part of her damages in a tort suit and that the state court's oder apportioning settlement proceeds did not bar the Federal government from seeking reimbursement for medical expenses.Taransky v Sec of US HHS No.… [read post]
8 May 2008, 6:37 pm
US v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 1:49 pm
I'm glad about the Supreme Court decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 10:22 am
Both due to the GE portion of genetically-engineered plants as well as do the use of pesticides on the field.So the County Council passes an ordinance that makes it a much bigger hassle to use pesticides, and that requires warnings to workers and the community. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 12:15 am
Palkon v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 11:09 am
In Bigger v. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 8:47 am
And last week an administrative judge upheld that decision (C.C. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 7:52 pm
Sometimes, bigger doesn’t mean better. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 12:15 am
Palkon v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:33 am
The problem is that the invention has to be of outstanding benefit to the employer, and the bigger the employer the harder it is to make that sort of impression on its business.Shanks v Unilever [2017] EWCA Civ 2 was perhaps the paradigm case of an employee's invention not being of outstanding benefit to his employer because the company was too big to pay. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 12:35 pm
Here is the abstract: In its September 2010 decision in Mohamed v. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 7:23 am
Kozel v. [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 9:55 am
And a related one: a bigger tablet comes with trade-offs versus a smaller tablet. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 8:32 am
So was Bush v. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 7:23 am
Kozel v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 5:14 am
Grimm v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 4:56 am
See, e.g., White v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 3:41 am
One of the bigger cases of the current Supreme Court term pits federal control over legalized sports betting versus state’s rights. [read post]
