Search for: "Board of Education v. Commission on Civil Rights"
Results 141 - 160
of 505
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
Although in People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that a civil service commission cannot mandate a rule of one with respect to appointing an individual from an examination eligible list to a position in the competitive class, the appointing authority itself may elect to be bound by such a rule. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
Although in People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that a civil service commission cannot mandate a rule of one with respect to appointing an individual from an examination eligible list to a position in the competitive class, the appointing authority itself may elect to be bound by such a rule. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 6:57 am
In June, the justices re-affirmed this understanding, and the corresponding right of religious communities to select their own teachers and teachings, in Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 2:55 pm
Take Action If you are based in Mexico, we urge you to participate in R3D's campaign "Ni Censura ni Candados" and send a letter to Mexico's National Commission for Human Rights to asking them to invalidate this new flawed copyright law. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 6:52 am
Walker River Irrigation District (Water Rights) Sisto v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 4:49 pm
Walker River Irrigation District (Water Rights)Sisto v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
CALIFORNIA WATER RIGHTS AND SUPPLY 1. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed the judgment in a civil action. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 7:01 pm
Board of Education (prohibiting racial segregation in public education), Miranda v. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 7:11 am
Nyanzi v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 6:38 am
Colorado Civil Rights Commission (2018), this evocation of the racist bigot played a key role in arguments by baker Jack Phillips and his amici that he was a sincere man of faith who loved everyone. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 1:38 pm
Congress didn’t focus on gay and transgender rights in the Civil Rights Act of 1964, did it? [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 6:01 am
Board of Education (1954), Bolling v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 6:00 am
Board of Education (1954), Bolling v. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 4:48 pm
I was looking at histories of civil liberty lawyering across territories that had been part of the British empire, most of my lawyers were engaged in resisting the powers of a variety of Emergency regimes, be it during anti-colonial wars of independence (Kenya, Malaysia, Cyprus); struggles of postcolonial state formation (India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka), or during military occupation (postwar Europe). [read post]
22 May 2020, 8:51 am
An objective, fact-based evaluation of America’s history regarding home ownership, education, the use of the criminal legal system, and other critical areas of American life will reveal a government-supported philosophy that is best described by Thurgood Marshall in his Supreme Court argument in Brown v. the Board. [read post]
14 May 2020, 9:01 pm
Board of Education, it is also presumptively a problematic basis to use in affirmative action programs which seek to benefit African Americans, albeit to the material detriment of other groups such as white persons. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester… [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester… [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester… [read post]
