Search for: "Border v. United States of America" Results 141 - 160 of 745
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2020, 9:48 pm by Sophia Tang
However, there is no authority support extension of jurisdiction to cross-border tort. [read post]
21 Mar 2020, 4:48 am by Sophia Tang
However, there is no authority support extension of jurisdiction to cross-border tort. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie chronicles the recent maneuvering and “histrionics” over whether “New York City’s altered legal terrain will be enough to erase” New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 2:19 am by SHG
To the extent there's a saving grace, it's that even border searches must be reasonable, though up to now, the operative law treats computers like any other sealed container and considers a search of a laptop to be routine, per the 1985 Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:18 am by Andrew Wainer
  Root Causes In July, the Biden administration launched its Central America migration strategy focused on root causes—a welcome shift in the United States’ conceptualization of migration dynamics after at least a decade of advocacy for a more holistic U.S. immigration policy. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 4:00 am by Sarah Sutherland
Canada, [2008] 3 FCR 606, 2007 FC 1262 [1] The Canadian Council for Refugees (CCR), the Canadian Council of Churches (CCC), Amnesty International (AI) and John Doe, a Colombian refugee claimant in the United States, filed a judicial review application challenging the Agreement between the Government of Canada and the Government of the United States of America for Cooperation in the Examination of Refugee Status Claims from Nationals of Third Countries… [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie writes that Monday’s decision in Virginia House of Delegates v. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 5:22 pm by Matthew Kahn
TRUMP, by the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including sections 212(f) and 215(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. 1182(f) and 1185(a), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, hereby find that, absent the measures set forth in this proclamation, the immigrant and nonimmigrant entry into the United States of persons described in section 2 of this… [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 9:13 am by Sarah Libowsky, Krista Oehlke
The United States Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP) is but one example. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm by Michael Lowe
  A “national of the United States” is defined as “(A) a citizen of the United States, or (B) a person who, though not a citizen of the United States, owes permanent allegiance to the United States. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 2:48 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
Homeland Security Investigations and US Attorneys' offices did just that in Operation Mummy's Curse, which involved the case of United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 12:58 pm by Peter Margulies
U.S. asylum officers are in the main dedicated and capable, but judicial review of asylum decisions at the U.S. border is exceedingly limited—limits that the Supreme Court upheld on June 25 in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 3:37 pm by Larry
The one at the center of FDK America, Inc. v United States is, even as discovery disputes go, a strange one. [read post]