Search for: "Born v. Social Security Administration" Results 141 - 160 of 220
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2014, 7:27 pm
Over many months, my administration has held discussions with the Cuban government about Alan’s case, and other aspects of our relationship. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 4:37 am by Jane Chong
Eldridge (quite the stretch, given that was a civil case addressing whether an individual is entitled to a hearing before his Social Security benefits are terminated, not before he is terminated). [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am by Barry Sookman
The inventor secures exclusive rights in return for new, ingenious, useful and unobvious disclosures and dedication of the invention to the public when the term expires. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 12:00 am by My name
[xii] According to official Social Security Administration data, “[o]ver the next 50 years, new legal immigrants entering the United States will provide a net benefit of $407 billion in present value to America’s Social Security system. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:38 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
 This IMMI goes jointly to the Supreme Court for invalidating most of DOMA (the Defense of Marriage Act) in U.S. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 5:38 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
 This IMMI goes jointly to the Supreme Court for invalidating most of DOMA (the Defense of Marriage Act) in U.S. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 8:38 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
 This IMMI goes jointly to the Supreme Court for invalidating most of DOMA (the Defense of Marriage Act) in U.S. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 5:45 am by K.O. Herston
More than 800 American children born in 2012 were named Messiah, according to the Social Security Administration; nearly 4,000 were named Jesus; about 500 were named Mohammed; and 29 baby boys were named Christ. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 8:41 am by Joel R. Brandes
Upon arrival in Utah, the Children carried with them a passport, social security cards, child identification cards issued by the state of California, immunization records for both Children, and birth certificates which had been given to them by the Petitioner before they left Mexico. [read post]
15 May 2013, 6:55 am by Joel R. Brandes
Court of Appeals Paternity - Defense of Equitable Estoppel - Applied to Deny Non-Biological Father Right to Deny Paternity In Commissioner of Social Services on Behalf of Elizabeth S. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 3:57 pm by NL
[Hall v Wandsworth at 29]Mitu v Camden LBC [2011] EWCA Civ 1249 is taken as an explanation of Hall, when Lewison LJ says:Section 203 (4) distinguishes between a “decision” and an “issue”. [read post]