Search for: "Bosch v. Bosch" Results 141 - 160 of 211
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2011, 11:06 am
This morning the Court of Appeal (Jacob and Sedley LJJ and Norris J) handed down its judgment in Nokia v IPCom [2011] EWCA Civ 6.By way of back story: IPCom (described in the judgment as a “non practising entity”, i.e. a patentee with no business of its own in products covered by the patents), owned a number of patents (which it had bought from Bosch) in the field of mobile communications technology. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 9:55 pm by Florian Mueller
A patent attorney from the Bosch Jehle firm, representing Netlist, showed a computer animation meant to distinguish the claimed invention from the prior art, but patent attorney Dr. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 9:49 pm
Since the IRS is not a party to this proceeding and in any event would not be bound by any determination of this court under Commissioner v. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 5:34 pm
Since the IRS is not a party to this proceeding and in any event would not be bound by any determination of this court under Commissioner v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 1:17 am by Florian Mueller
Robart, clearly a thought leader and pioneer among U.S. federal judges with respect to FRAND, in the Microsoft v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 7:35 am by Two-Seventy-One Patent Blog
  In 2010, U.S. companies obtained 50.3% of granted patents, compared with 49% in 2009.High-tech patents also dominated areas with the heaviest new patenting activity:Multiplex Communications (US class 370) -- 3.3% of totalSolid-State Devices and Transistors (US class 257) -- 3.1%Semiconductors (US class 438) -- 2.7%Drug Compositions (US class 514) -- 2.1%  Data Processing and File Management (US class 707) -- 2%Computers and Processing Systems (US class 709) -- 2%… [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 5:17 am by Ray Mullman
Don’t blame trial lawyers and create a false dichotomy of “business v. lawyers. [read post]