Search for: "Brady v. State of California"
Results 141 - 160
of 302
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm
United States (1997), in which the Supreme Court held that the federal government could not require state and local law enforcement officers to conduct background checks on gun purchasers as part of the implementation of a federal law (the Brady gun control law). [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 1:28 pm
On February 10, in Hamen v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 8:21 am
California, 11-5796; Kwon v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
California, 370 U.S. 660 (1962). [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 1:44 pm
Ct. 1350 (2011) (a district attorney’s office may not be held liable under § 1983 for failure to train its prosecutors based on a single Brady violation). [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 10:16 am
The prosecutors argue that the Northern District of California has discretion to stay the civil case in favor of their parallel criminal action against Balwani and Elizabeth Holmes. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:00 am
Imburgia 14-462Issue: Whether the California Court of Appeal erred by holding, in direct conflict with the Ninth Circuit, that a reference to state law in an arbitration agreement governed by the Federal Arbitration Act requires the application of state law preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:50 am
” State v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 5:31 am
Plata - Court upholds Federal court order finding constitutional violations in California’s prison overcrowding, and requiring the state to reduce its prison population. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:03 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, October 27, 2008 US v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 9:30 am
State Dept. of Health Services v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 3:39 pm
" The Washington Post reports that a state sponsor of terrorism is already attempting to obtain these guns. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 11:24 am
His petition asks (1) whether the Louisiana courts erred in failing to find that the state’s failure to disclose exculpatory evidence violated its obligation under Brady v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 7:59 am
Alabama, 16-7835 Issue: Whether a state court can enforce a rule that Brady v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 8:36 am
Lambert Docket: 11-38 Issue: Did the Third Circuit fail to properly apply the habeas deference standard to the state court’s rejection of respondent’s Brady claim? [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE UPPER DECK COMPANY et al., Plaintiffs, Cross-defendants and Appellants, v.ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE, Defendant, Cross-complainant and Respondent. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 2:23 pm
Bagley, Brady v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:42 pm
City of Newport Beach, California v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:15 am
Lynaugh]”; (2) whether the state’s post-trial disclosure of evidence relating to ammunition used in the crime resulted in a violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments under Brady v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 7:23 am
The second prong of Complete Auto Transit v. [read post]
