Search for: "Brett Thomas"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,435
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2023, 2:08 pm
Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote for the majority, in a decision joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Amy Coney Barrett, and Ketanji Brown Jackson. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 8:30 am
Justice Brett Kavanaugh, writing for the majority, largely relied on the precedent set by Linda R.S. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 3:37 pm
Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s opinion for a narrow majority of five justices reverses that ruling. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 10:13 am
Indeed, much of Justice Brett Kavanaugh's majority opinion makes more sense that way. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 10:03 am
Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote for a majority that included Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 7:02 am
Justice Brett M. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 7:02 am
Justice Brett M. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
”Three Justices Say the Dictum SurvivesDespite the tension between Heller’s dictum and Bruen’s holding, a concurring opinion in Bruen by Justice Brett Kavanaugh joined by Chief Justice John Roberts repeated the dictum verbatim. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:47 am
Chohan, decided Friday by the Supreme Court of Texas, in an opinion by Justice Jimmy Blacklock, joined by Chief Justice Nathan Hecht and Justice Brett Busby, and mostly joined by Justice Jane Bland (three Justices didn't participate in the decision, so these four were a majority of the remaining six): This case arises from a fatal accident on an icy, unlit stretch of highway near Amarillo. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Justice Neil Gorsuch joined Justice Thomas’s separate opinion in Seila Law, while Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett concurred in Justice Kagan’s majority in Polansky but wrote separately to say that they agreed with Justice Thomas that there are substantial doubts about whether qui tam actions are consistent with Article II.Will History Count? [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 2:12 pm
Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett concurred with the majority, while also acknowledging the relevancy of Justice Thomas’ Article II concerns. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 1:12 pm
Justice Clarence Thomas’s dissent was joined by Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett in questioning whether the whistleblower provisions of the False Claims Act violate Article II of the U.S. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:47 am
While only Thomas wrote in support of his argument about the extent of the government’s authority to dismiss, Justice Brett Kavanaugh issued a concurring opinion, joined by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, in which he agreed with Thomas that “[t]here are substantial arguments that the qui tam device is inconsistent with Article II and that private litigators may not represent the interests of the United States in litigation … the Court should consider the… [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 12:27 pm
Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito each filed separate dissents. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 3:04 pm
It is clear where Justice Clarence Thomas stands. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Joined by the Court’s three Democratic appointees and (in nearly all of the opinion) Justice Brett Kavanaugh, the Chief Justice reaffirmed a key 37-year-old precedent—Thornburg v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 2:21 pm
Department of Education relisted a petition raising this issue twice before denying review over a dissent by Justice Clarence Thomas, joined by Justice Brett Kavanaugh. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 10:33 am
” But Section 2 “demands no such thing,” Thomas insisted. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 9:19 am
., at 944 (opinion of THOMAS, J.). [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 7:06 am
Justice Brett M. [read post]
