Search for: "Brink v. United States"
Results 141 - 159
of 159
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2009, 3:35 pm
The next question asked about the landmark case of Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 6:36 pm
United States, 460 F.3d 79 (D.C. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 11:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 8:19 pm
Ed. 2d 639 (1980) (quoting United States v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 6:27 am
" United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2009, 5:43 am
The Cases of the United States and the NetherlandsBibi Van Ginkel, Combating International Terrorism: New Powers for the Security Council? [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 3:48 pm
" Haven't they heard of United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 6:04 am
When waterboarding prisoners, American torturers would sometimes deliberately bring them to the brink of death. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 9:47 am
As the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Delaware) just reaffirmed, in the context of an ERISA plan that offers employees the option of investing in a fund consisting solely of the employer's own securities, there is a "presumption that a fiduciary acted prudently in investing in employer securities" and that, to rebut the presumption, "a 'plaintiff must show that the ERISA fiduciary could not… [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
ECJ clarifies rules relating to notice: K-Swiss Inc v OHIM (Class 46) EU Competitiveness Council resolution against counterfeiting and piracy (Class 46) EU states back three-point anti-piracy plan (Managing Intellectual Property) Fuel cells and wind power lead European patent filings for clean energy technology (Green Patent Blog) More non-minor geographical indicator (GI) amendments published (Class 46) No sign of any Community patent progress, despite Verheugen's optimism… [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 5:52 am
In Andrews v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 3:49 pm
But this case is not about the United States' or Texas' rights to implement criminal laws. [read post]
13 May 2008, 9:54 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 10:58 am
United States of America v. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 12:15 am
DISTRICT COURTEASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice
18 USC §3509(m) Constitutional; Defense Counsel Can Examine Computer Drive at Government Office
United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 6:21 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 4:35 am
Even so, administration officials have continued to promote the idea that the United States should wield its military power early, often and unilaterally to secure its interests around the world. [read post]
31 Oct 2006, 5:52 am
Celebrezze v. [read post]
21 Nov 2005, 1:03 pm
What is less understood, however, is how the new law could hurt the entire United States economy, and consequently, the financial wellbeing of all Americans. [read post]
