Search for: "Britt v. Britt"
Results 141 - 160
of 185
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2012, 3:04 am
The appellate court granted the writ (People v. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 6:43 am
Britt, 388 F.3d 1369, 1372 (11th Cir. 2004). [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 12:22 pm
Britt, CPA, J.D. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 4:23 pm
From the outset, Wilkinson had said to Higgins’ boyfriend, David Sharaz, that she proposed to “hold Britt’s hand through all this”. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 11:57 am
No, said an Eleventh Circuit panel (Judges Bert Jordan, Britt Grant & Robert Luck) today in Vallejo v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 11:57 am
No, said an Eleventh Circuit panel (Judges Bert Jordan, Britt Grant & Robert Luck) today in Vallejo v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 1:06 pm
The compensation amount under Section 1.61 21(f)(5)(iii) remains unchanged at $215,000.The Code provides that the $1,000,000,000 threshold used to determine whether a multiemployer plan is a systematically important plan under section 432(e)(9)(H)(v)(III)(aa) is adjusted using the cost-of-living adjustment provided under Section 432(e)(9)(H)(v)(III)(bb). [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 7:50 pm
Branch v. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 1:30 am
Sanoma Media, the publisher of the famous magazine Playboy, had commissioned a photographer to take photos for the magazine of Britt Dekker, a Dutch TV personality. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 1:30 am
After, what felt like a small eternity to this writer, the CJEU has released its judgment on the case yesterday.The case of GS Media BV v Sanoma Media Netherlands BV dealt with pictures of Britt Dekker (a famous Dutch TV personality), commissioned by Sanoma Media for publication in Playboy magazine. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 9:38 am
TweetIn Feldman v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 2:38 pm
Earl Britt of Raleigh, dismissed the commitment proceedings for each of them. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 4:29 am
The case was EEOC v. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 9:06 am
Therefore, as MindGeek’s motion to dismiss concerns only questions of law, no discovery is required to rule on the motion to dismiss. * Britt v. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 6:06 am
Britt, 508 F.2d 1052 (U.S. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 1:38 pm
The dollar limitation under Section 414(v)(2)(B)(ii) for catch-up contributions to an applicable employer plan described in Section 401(k)(11) or Section 408(p) for individuals aged 50 or over is increased from $2,500 to $3,000.The annual compensation limitation under Section 401(a)(17) for eligible participants in certain governmental plans that, under the plan as in effect on July 1, 1993, allowed cost of living adjustments to the compensation limitation under the plan under… [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 8:42 am
See Britt v. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 8:42 am
See Britt v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 11:52 am
’ Britt v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 9:01 pm
Earl Britt of the U.S. [read post]
