Search for: "Brown v. Phillips"
Results 141 - 160
of 367
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2012, 11:15 pm
Indeed, though Lord Kerr recognises (at [112]) that Pupino has stronger ‘injunctive force’, their Lordships indicate with varying degrees of certainty that, without Pupino, ‘the general presumption that the UK legislates in compliance with international obligations would produce the same result’ (at [98], per Lord Brown; see also [10], per Lord Phillips PSC, [112], per Lord Kerr and [121]-[122], per Lord Dyson). [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:44 pm
[i] Raimonde v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 8:14 am
Brown, 53 S.W.3d 264, 275 (Tenn. [read post]
28 May 2012, 4:08 am
Read more Natasha Phillips produces the Researching Reform blog – a fine resource with incisive, analytical and critical commentary on the family law justice system: Her recent piece Single Fathers and the Economic Crisis caught my eye. [read post]
21 May 2012, 8:13 am
The deep south was not ready to accept public defense for indigent, mainly black defendants, not unlike how it refused to accept Brown v School Board. [read post]
21 May 2012, 8:13 am
The deep south was not ready to accept public defense for indigent, mainly black defendants, not unlike how it refused to accept Brown v School Board. [read post]
8 May 2012, 6:42 am
The key legal questions facing Lords Phillips, Brown and Kerr are likely to concern the interpretation of: (1) The Cross Border Insolvency Regulations 2006; (2) UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency; and (3) The Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (External Requests and Orders) Order 2005. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 9:46 am
This approach was further endorsed in the judgments of Lords Phillips, Mance and Brown, each of whom reaffirmed the broader approach adopted by both the High Court and Court of Appeal. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 11:57 am
" US v Phillip Shaw, et al. - Federal Criminal Complaint 21 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 11:57 am
" US v Phillip Shaw, et al. - Federal Criminal Complaint 21 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 8:31 am
The bench throughout is Lords Hope, Brown, Mance, Dyson and Sumption. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 2:19 pm
Brown, 7 No. 21 Westlaw Journal Medical Malpractice 1, Westlaw Journal Medical Malpractice March 16, 2012 The U.S. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 6:47 am
Lord Brown agreed with this approach [111]. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:28 am
Lord Brown agreed with this approach [111]. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:22 am
Lord Brown agreed with this approach [111]. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 5:40 am
See also Kellogg Brown & Root International, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:26 am
From Tuesday 20 March 2012 over three days are the linked appeals of Perry & Ors v Serious Organised Crime Agency and Perry & Ors (No. 2) v Serious Organised Crime Agency, which will be heard by a panel of nine (L Phillips, L Hale, L Brown, L Judge, L Kerr, L Wilson, L Clarke, L Reed and Sir Anthony Hughes). [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:19 am
From Tuesday 13 March until Wednesday 14 March 2012 is the Privy Council hearing of The Queen ex p Mario Hoffmann v The Commissioner for the Turks & Caicos Islands Commission of Inquiry (2008-2009) and The Governor of the Turks & Caicos Islands, to be heard by Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Kerr and Dyson. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:59 pm
The importance of the role of the media to the principle of open justice is nothing new: see, eg Scott v Scott [1913] AC 417. [read post]
