Search for: "Brown v. Standard Insurance Company" Results 141 - 160 of 237
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
We are unwilling to make brand manufacturers the de facto insurers for competing generic manufacturers. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:55 pm by Tom Goldstein
Allstate Insurance Co., the Court held that state law cannot block federal class actions (a pro-plaintiff result) in an opinion by Justice Scalia (!) [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 11:38 am by Aaron Nielson
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Public Citizen maintained that it had standing to challenge a tire-safety standard on the ground that the standard would increase the risk of injury to the organization’s members. [read post]
26 Jul 2006, 12:25 pm
Conway Express, Inc., 261 Ga. 41 (1991); Georgia Power Company v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 8:13 am by Charles B. Jimerson, Esq.
Actual Damages FDUTPA claims often fail under the third element of the Rollins standard: actual damages. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 3:49 am
Pyett, No. 07-581Enforceability of collectively bargained arbitration clauseo April 1, 2009 decision hereo SCOTUS docket hereo SCOTUSWIKI hereo Noted here: Law.com; Washington Post; Mayer Brown; Business Insurance; FYI: Central Ohio Employment Law Update; Jottings By An Employment Lawyer; Paul Mollica; Ogletree DeakinsArgued - Awaiting DecisionAT&T v. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 4:50 pm by Russell Knight
Evid. 702 This standard for being qualified as an expert is very low. [read post]
27 May 2010, 10:30 am by Erin Miller
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, the Court limited the time period in which plaintiffs claiming discrimination could recoup lost wages. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 4:02 am
§ 1679, et seq., prohibits provisions that purport to waive a consumer's right to sue in court for CROA violations.Pregnant welder sues employer for discriminationRoetzel & AndressOn August 10, 2010, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals issued its decision in Spees v. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 10:13 pm by aaronklaw
For example, an Arizona jury awarded a homeowner and his family more than $4 million for a case where the insurance carrier delayed remediating mold contamination (Hatley v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
-based firms (including subsidiaries) with at least $500 million in annual revenues would likely qualify as “doing business” in California.[17] (Insurance companies, which are covered by other separate legislation in California, are excluded.) [read post]