Search for: "Brown v. Thomas" Results 141 - 160 of 1,399
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2011, 1:26 am by Anita Davies
 In many ways the most interesting part of the Court of Appeal judgment was the final section in which Thomas LJ posed two questions. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 9:28 am by Michael C. Dorf
Justice Thomas cited last year's decision in Brown v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:43 am by Kent Scheidegger
Much of the discussion on the Supreme Court today will likely be in the violent video game case, Brown v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 2:01 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Clinton, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 2 (17 January 2012) High Court (Chancery Division) Royal Bank of Scotland v Revenue And Customs [2012] EWHC 9 (Ch) (17 January 2012) Armstrong DLW GmbH v Winnington Networks Ltd [2012] EWHC 10 (Ch) (11 January 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Thomas Brown Estates Ltd v Hunters Partners Ltd [2012] EWHC 30 (QB) (17 January 2012) Legal Services Commission… [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:30 pm by David Tanenhaus
If the United States Supreme Court issued an opinion on integrated schools and ignored Brown v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 2:57 am by Walter Olson
” [Robert Thomas, Inverse Condemnation, on Colony Cove Properties, LLC v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 9:30 pm by ernst
Descendants from the parties in Dred Scott v Sandford, Plessy v Ferguson and Brown v Board of Education meet at the second Dred Scott Reconciliation Conference, to be held today from 8:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. at the Mahler Ballroom, 4915 Washington Blvd. in St. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 10:33 pm by Patricia Salkin
This post was authored by Touro Law student Thomas Brown ‘20   When Manuel Alvarez could no longer afford the rising rent for his meat supply shop on Bergenline Avenue in Union City, he found a new location on Central Avenue. [read post]
12 May 2009, 2:23 am
A Petition for Certiorari has been filed in Brown v. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 4:40 am
In Thomas v Brown and Tennant [1997] FCA 215, the Federal Court of Australia ultimately found that Mr Thomas was the author of the Artistic Work, and thus the owner of the bundle of rights subsisting in it. [read post]