Search for: "Buckley v State" Results 141 - 160 of 493
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2014, 7:57 am
The only state supreme court ever to probe the meaning of the phrase is that of Oregon, which, in Vannatta v. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 1:44 am
TOM, J.P., SULLIVAN, WILLIAMS, BUCKLEY, MALONE, JJ. *1 (Cite as: 2007 WL 764515, *1 (N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept.)) ... 7. The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 12:27 am
ANDRIAS, J.P., FRIEDMAN, MARLOW, NARDELLI, CATTERSON, JJ. *1 (Cite ... 7. The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 11:25 am by Leah Nicholls
In his column about the proposed amendment, Tribe writes that the rise of super PACs has less to do with the decision in Citizens United than the 1976 decision in Buckley v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 8:18 am
Buckley reportedly floated the idea of a Goldwater/Eisenhower ticket in 1964. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 9:32 pm by Rick Hasen
But Justice Brennan’s switch in Bellotti is not all that surprising when one considers his earlier vacillation about contributions and spending limits in the Buckley case, which I describe in my article, The Untold Drafting History of Buckley v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 9:12 am
I don’t entirely agree with him — I’m one of the few people who thinks Buckley v. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 12:38 am
Saxe, J.P., Friedman, Marlow, Buckley, Sweeny, JJ. ... 9. . The People of the State of New York, SCI / Appellant, v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 12:50 pm by Rick Hasen
Guests: Brian Schweitzer: State of Montana, @brianschweitzer Rick Hasen: University of California, Irvine, @rickhasen Dave Levinthal: Politico, @davelevinthal Eugene Volokh: University of California, Los Angeles, @VolokhC Links: Schweitzer on ‘mining for influence in Montana’ (NY Times) Buckley v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 3:40 pm by Rick Hasen
   Perhaps most relevant is this in-chambers opinion of Chief Justice Roberts in Lux v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 1:17 pm by Lawrence Solum
The majority saw itself as returning the Court to the fountainhead of this jurisprudence, the Court’s 1976 opinion in Buckley v. [read post]