Search for: "Buckman "
Results 141 - 160
of 515
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2007, 2:33 pm
Almost since Buckman has been decided, courts have tried to chip away at it, something we've discussed before. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 11:59 am
To allow such a claim would be to allow an improper circumvention of Section 337(a) and Buckman. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 11:00 am
Off-label promotion should call off Buckman preemption. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 7:49 am
Many years ago the Multnomah County health department snuck a private methadone clinic into the Buckman neighborhood of southeast Portland over the holidays without a word of notice to the neighborhood. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 9:48 am
A number of residents in the inner southeast neighborhood don't want a historic district. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 4:51 pm
The judge overseeing multidistrict litigation regarding the bone-building drugs Aredia and Zometa dismissed plaintiffs' claims finding that a Texas law shields manufacturers of Food & Drug Administration-approved drugs from liability for failure to warn. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 6:09 am
(A use of Rule 54(b) also produced the Buckman appeal.)Not so fast! [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 2:57 pm
” Buckman, 531 U.S. at 350.Id. at 16 n.3. [read post]
4 Jan 2007, 7:24 am
[from Boomberg]Ben Dobbin reported: The agreements, signed Friday [Dec. 29], are royalty bearing to Kodak, the company said, but further financial terms of the deals were not disclosed.The deal "essentially tells me that Kodak more or less won," said Ulysses Yannas, a broker with investment firm Buckman, Buckman & Reid in New York. [read post]
6 Jun 2015, 10:24 am
., and since May 2015, Buckman, Buckman & Reid, Inc. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 9:29 am
In comparing the language of the bad faith count at issue in this case with the language of the allegation in the operative complaint in Buckman, the court was not persuaded that a more specific or objective set of facts needed to be set forth in the complaint. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 5:49 am
§337(a); Buckman Co. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 12:05 pm
Under Buckman, private plaintiffs cannot pursue state law claims related to those sorts of alleged violations.That interpretation (though it's a little hard to express) is the best way to reconcile Buckman and Riegel, so it must be right.And that reading makes clear that Riegel's exception for parallel state law claims is not an exception that swallows the rule. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 5:03 am
Cook’s motion relied in part on Buckman Co. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 8:50 am
Part IV describes the Supreme Court's decision in Buckman Co. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 3:10 pm
Some courts find that imposing liability under a statute that requires a showing of “fraud on the FDA” would violate Buckman, and others, like Desiano, have not. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 5:00 am
The Supreme Court so held in Buckman Co. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 4:02 am
"Maple" connects Buckman and Kerns with the west side, which is also a little odd. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 1:52 pm
Both preemption in the context of food and preemption under Buckman will be impacted by the result, since both turn significantly on the same question.SCOTUSblog has further information, and the petition documents, on Pom Wonderful in the Supreme Court here. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 10:08 am
It also should not be terribly surprising that the decision came from this judge, who issued the first published decision excluding evidence under Buckman, Bouchard v. [read post]
