Search for: "Burden v. North Dakota"
Results 141 - 160
of 243
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2016, 1:25 pm
In any event, we can only hope that one federal judge in the District of North Dakota will come to his senses as the case progresses. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 12:11 pm
Smith v. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 1:54 pm
North Dakota (14-1468); Bernard v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
North, 135 Cal. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 8:46 am
Numerous challenges against the WOTUS rule are pending in courts around the country, including one in North Dakota I covered here. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 10:33 am
The United States Supreme court in South Dakota v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:47 am
¶37 (quoting Bundy v. [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 9:51 am
This North Dakota law clearly runs afoul of the current “undue burden” test as it would prohibit some abortions before fetal viability. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 10:43 am
Overview Agricultural law is often “law by the exception. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 10:35 am
This opposition—rooted in concerns over states’ rights and the Constitution—will take center stage in coming months in four lawsuits originating in Texas, Georgia, Ohio, and North Dakota. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
North Dakota, 14-973, a summertime sequel. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm
Tatum 14-656Issue: (1) Whether the plaintiff bears the burden of proving loss causation under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 11:24 am
North Dakota 14-973Issue: Whether or under what circumstances police officers conduct a search within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment when they trespass in common areas of locked apartment buildings to look for evidence of criminal activity. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 8:30 am
LEXIS 40614 (D ND, March 30, 2015), a North Dakota federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendation (2015 U.S. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 10:03 am
North Dakota, that the “negative” or “dormant” Commerce Clause prohibits a state from requiring an out-of-state retailer with no physical in-state presence to collect the state’s sales or use tax. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 12:05 pm
Enough said. v [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 9:06 am
It just says that North Dakota cannot make amazon.com collect the tax. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
Both Hamms worked at Continental Resources, an oil company that was in the process of leasing huge swaths of land in North Dakota, Montana, and Canada. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 8:49 pm
Hanson v. [read post]
