Search for: "Bush v. Social Security Administration" Results 141 - 160 of 194
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2017, 8:33 am by Quinta Jurecic
And with respect to the President, in particular, it is what undergirds the Supreme Court’s decision in Clinton v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am by Tom Goldstein
As a consequence, the appointment of Stevens’ successor by a Democratic President with a Democratic Senate is unlikely to shift the Court’s rulings on most important social issues, such as abortion, affirmative action, religion, and gay rights. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 3:00 am by Garrett Hinck
Bush and Yashushi Kudo will discuss. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 6:59 am by Edith Roberts
Bush nominated him to be a district-court judge. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 3:00 am by Garrett Hinck
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 11:39 am
Johnson launched a War on Poverty, which expanded the New Deal initiatives in addition to taking on new projects, such as adding Medicare to the Social Security Act, creating Head Start, and forming the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare (now Health and Human Services). [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 1:38 pm by Ilya Shapiro - Guest
Primary resources In an era when, in response to the excesses of the Bush and Obama administrations, citizens question not simply the wisdom of a given policy but the authority for enacting it, legal commentators find themselves at the center of public discussions that far transcend a think-tank scholar’s typical bailiwick. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 9:13 am by Tony Infanti
Notably, this represents a complete reversal of the position taken in a ruling issued during the Bush administration, which refused to recognize state property law as applied to same-sex couples (even though these same state property laws have long been recognized for federal tax purposes as applied to different-sex married couples). [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 10:05 pm
Thanks George Bush for leaving us in such an extraordinary mess. [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 7:53 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
To prevail under this standard, a Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) must accept the testimony of a medical provider that the Claimant is not able to engage in at least sedentary employment, defined by the Social Security Administration as follows:   lifting no more than 10 pounds at a time and occasionally lifting or carrying articles like docket files, ledgers, and small tools. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 12:29 am
" Didn't the Bush administration do the exact same thing with the Corporate Fraud Task Force? [read post]
21 May 2023, 9:00 pm by Neil H. Buchanan and Michael C. Dorf
The most straightforward way to understand his thinking is apparently that the pendency of the inevitable lawsuits would so roil the financial markets that the economy would be damaged in the meantime—AND that doing so would be worse than the alternatives.Again, he is right that there would be a political crisis, and the days, weeks, or months that the world would spend waiting for a resolution would make the 2000 Bush v. [read post]