Search for: "Byrne v. United States"
Results 141 - 160
of 170
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2011, 6:33 am
Possible relevance for Ireland Our Housing Act 1966 bears striking resemblance to the 1996 Act in the UK, especially inasmuch as a District Court judge is required (“shall”, s. 62; Dublin Corporation v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 11:15 am
We’ve blogged about United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 4:13 pm
Notes that European Union and United States officials will kick off talks in Washington on 9 Dec 2010 on a personal data protection agreement when cooperating to fight terrorism or crime. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 5:27 pm
The court also concludes that Vermont’s program is unreasonable as applied to Byrne’s JN36TN plate:” Related posts:Why Wasn’t United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 8:21 am
CACI International and Titan Corp., which considers whether private contractors working overseas for the military can be liable for torture committed at Abu Ghraib – the Court invited the Acting Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States. [read post]
31 May 2010, 3:11 am
(Copyright Litigation Blog) District Court C D California permanently enjoins IsoHunt, Fung (Copyrights & Campaigns) (TorrentFreak) US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps David Byrne - David Byrne sues Charlie Crist over use of ‘Road to Nowhere’ in campaign video (Copyrights & Campaigns) Facebook - EFF weighs in: Facebook v. [read post]
ALJ Rogers Denies Complainant’s Motion to Compel In Certain Silicon Microphone Packages (337-TA-695)
25 May 2010, 2:16 pm
Byrne, 257 F.R.D. 645, 665 (N.D. [read post]
14 May 2010, 7:31 am
Byrne discussed the United States Fair Housing Act and a recent decision regarding its application to 'companion animals'. [read post]
14 May 2010, 6:23 am
Byrne discussed the United States Fair Housing Act and a recent decision regarding its application to 'companion animals'. [read post]
13 May 2010, 12:15 pm
United States.) [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 2:30 pm
AUTO – GRAVES AMENDMENT – RENTED TRUCK – RESTRICTED DRIVER'S LICENSE – FAILURE TO PRODUCE RENTAL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES PRECLUDES SUMMARY JUDGMENT – NEGLIGENT ENTRUSTMENT THEORY Byrne v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 11:23 am
Moreover, I would argue that plea bargaining in this country is in a constant state of flux, especially in the wake of the Supreme Court's opinion in United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Miller (Lewis and Clark), Judith V. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 11:48 am
Supreme Court addressed a question left open in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 6:48 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
– ‘Rioja’ GI survives (Class 46) Suriname Impersonator acquitted of attempting to deceive paying customers into thinking she is the true Toni Braxton (1709 Copyright Blog) Switzerland Some data on 3D trademarks in Switzerland (Class 46) Shapes that made it, and those that didn’t (Class 46) United Kingdom EWHC: Revocation proceedings not an abuse of process even if not commercially justified: TNS Group Holdings Ltd v Neilsen Media… [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
– ‘Rioja’ GI survives (Class 46) Suriname Impersonator acquitted of attempting to deceive paying customers into thinking she is the true Toni Braxton (1709 Copyright Blog) Switzerland Some data on 3D trademarks in Switzerland (Class 46) Shapes that made it, and those that didn’t (Class 46) United Kingdom EWHC: Revocation proceedings not an abuse of process even if not commercially justified: TNS Group Holdings Ltd… [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 5:48 am
Justice V. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt) Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:08 pm
United States, the Supreme Court granted district courts broad discretion in imposing sentences in an effort to create a sentencing scheme complying with the Sixth Amendment. [read post]
