Search for: "C. B. D. v. State of Alabama " Results 141 - 160 of 194
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
  They cite such reasons as: (a) it will provide uniform statutory provisions in contrast to the “Uniform Trade Secrets Act” (“UTSA”)—adopted by every state except New York and Massachusetts—but which contains some significant state variations; (b) rather than litigate in state courts, some attorneys and companies prefer federal courts, particularly because of federal bench experience with patent, trademark,… [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
But because the record did not reflect the existence of any similar significant public interest that required the disclosure of Father D's name, the court held that Father D's name must be redacted from any discovery documents that were released. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 7:13 am by Neil Cahn
Cooper, in his November 29, 2013 opinion in Travis v. [read post]