Search for: "C. R.C. C." Results 141 - 160 of 314
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2014, 9:15 am by MBettman
Pertinent to this appeal is Hoyle’s claim brought pursuant to R.C. 2745.01(C), the section of the intentional tort statute dealing with deliberate removal of an equipment safety guard. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 4:35 am by MBettman
R.C. 3105.18(C)(1)(c) (A court shall consider the ages and the physical, mental, and emotional conditions of the parties in determining whether spousal support is appropriate and reasonable.) [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 9:38 am by MBettman
Chief Justice O’Connor harshly disagreed with Kennedy’s interpretation of R.C. 2953.21(A)(1). [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 6:00 am by MBettman
Key Statutes and Precedent R.C. 955.11 (Dangerous Dog Defined)(A dangerous dog is one that has, without provocation, caused injury, other than killing or serious injury, to any person, killed another dog, or been the subject of a third violation under R.C. 955.22(C).) [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 7:42 am
” Expectedly, Appellants further contended that “even if the lease was not unenforceable in its entirety, at the very least the trial court should have found the early termination provision to be unconscionable and refused to enforce it under R.C. 5321.14(A) and R.C. 5321.16(B). [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 3:31 pm by MBettman
While fees to sponsors are capped, R.C. 3314.03(C), there is no ceiling on the amount of funding that can be passed on to private operators such as White Hat. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:00 am by DaytonDUI
 However, the prohibited concentration for whole blood is a concentration equal to or exceeding .096%, R.C.4511.19(A)(1)(c). [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 6:50 am by MBettman
(B)(Protected health information is confidential unless one of four statutory exceptions applies) (C)(Information that does not identify an individual is not protected health information and may be released in summary, statistical, or aggregate form.) [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 6:35 am by MBettman
Capital Care filed an administrative appeal to the Lucas County Court of Common Pleas, which reversed the license revocation, finding R.C. 3702.303(A), R.C. 3702.304, and R.C. 3727. 60(B) unconstitutional and the revocation contrary to law. [read post]