Search for: "CARR v. STATE" Results 141 - 160 of 828
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2019, 7:25 am
This decision is interesting to the AmeriKat in light of Henry Carr J's recent decision in Evalve & Abbott v Edwards Lifesciences [2019] EWHC 1158 in May where it was made clear that the preliminary injunction test is a series of gateways (see Kat report here). [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 12:43 am
PatentsIn Takeda v Roche: "Is it plausible? [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:04 am
| Beware of your old expert reports, as Henry Carr J allows hearsay expert evidence in Illumina v Ariosa | Still want to be a UPC judge? [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 11:18 am
| Beware of your old expert reports, as Henry Carr J allows hearsay expert evidence in Illumina v Ariosa | Still want to be a UPC judge? [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 7:28 am
| Beware of your old expert reports, as Henry Carr J allows hearsay expert evidence in Illumina v Ariosa | Still want to be a UPC judge? [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 2:43 am by Sally-Ann Underhill and Nicole Cheung
Carr J considered the key question to be striking the right balance, following Spar Shipping AS v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 1:54 am
The case primarily rested on how a skilled person would interpret the sketchy results and conclusions presented in the abstract.An interesting point that arose was whether "the state of the art" was the abstract in Japanese or the English translation of the abstract. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 7:52 am
Russia (I) (Just Satisfaction) Machiko Kanetake, María de los Ángeles González Carreño v. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
United States The Federal Trade Commission voted to approve a fine of roughly [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 1:06 pm by Sandy Levinson
Carr, correctly warning his colleagues that the Court was about to enter a “political thicket” from which it would never escape. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
DesignsRosie Burbidge published her last post as an official GuestKat, providing a tour of some recent design decisions, including Tynan v J4K Sports Ltd [2018] EWHC 3519 and Pulseon OY v Garmin (Europe) Ltd [2019] EWCA Civ 138. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 1:06 pm
The court addressed who owned what copyright in computer software developed by a service provider, but where the express contractual provisions left a lacuna as to IPR ownership.Annsley Merelle Ward reviews the ex tempore decision of Mr Justice Carr in Evalve & Abbott v Edwards Lifesciences [2019] EWHC 1158. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
Carr, which, it has been suggested, helped to trigger Frankfurter's stroke and retirement from the Court. [read post]