Search for: "CHANCELLOR v. CHANCELLOR"
Results 141 - 160
of 2,427
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2023, 3:00 am
Vice Chancellor Laster’s recent decision in Colon v. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 12:08 am
: on Green v The Lichfield Diocesan Board of Finance [2023] UKET 2409635/2022, which we noted here. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 3:00 am
., et. al. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 5:44 am
Every year after Labor Day, I take a step back to survey the most important current trends and developments in the world of Directors’ and Officers’ liability and insurance. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 12:23 am
Douglas Strang, Scottish Legal News: Higgs v Farmor’s School and others. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 11:21 pm
The most recent example is the Grand Chamber case of S, V and A v Denmark [GC], nos. 35553/12 and 2 others, 22 October 2018. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 5:43 am
Garcetti v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 12:25 pm
In Coster v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 5:01 am
From Griffin v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 11:44 am
Co. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 2:20 am
In short, the latter did not automatically ‘trump’ the views and wishes of the petitioners…Chancellor Eyre spoke with approval of the Guidance, whereas Chancellor Turner raised some real concerns about it. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 12:51 pm
As Vice Chancellor McCormick explained in Ray Beyond Corp. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2023, 12:08 am
Quick links David Etherington KC, Ecclesiastical Law Society Lecture: “In Defence of the Chancellor”: 13 September 2023, The Parish Church of St Mary-le-Bow, 18:00 – 19:30. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 11:41 am
From today's press release, by the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression:, about Palsgaard v. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 12:50 am
The full document is available here and our summary is here, and reflects the leading judgment of Lord Bingham (at 21) and the comments of Lord Hope (at 49) in Regina (Munjaz) v Mersey Care NHS Trust [2006] 2 AC 148. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 11:41 pm
In Gulshan v Lord Chancellor [2023] EWCA Civ 306, the issue was the refusal of permission for judicial review of the decision not to allow Mr Gulshan to bring his kirpan into Ealing Magistrates Court because it was longer than the six inches permitted under the Security and Safety Operating Procedures Guidance issued by HM Courts & Tribunals Service. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 10:26 am
Indeed, in McDonald’s II, the court reached back before Caremark to the 1963 Delaware Supreme Court decision in Graham v. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 3:00 am
Damage awards for breaches of a merger agreement are usually intended to give the buyer the “benefit of its bargain”, but Vice Chancellor Will’s recent opinion in NetApp v. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 7:48 am
” The operation of the Guidance in relation to kirpans was challenged in Gulshan v Lord Chancellor [2023] EWCA Civ 306. [read post]
