Search for: "CHAPPELL v. CHAPPELL"
Results 141 - 160
of 301
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
-> What the groundbreaking Schrems v. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
Software Patents Back To The Fore in India http://t.co/sJtaooRu4A -> No Copyright in the title of a literary work says court in India http://t.co/Gft0Vbe6Vi -> Computer and Internet Updates for 2015-10-15 http://t.co/Py8qeCyjrf -> Here's Warner/Chappell's Plan to Save the "Happy Birthday" Copyright http://t.co/xp5qd2qic0 -> Computer and Internet Updates for 2015-10-15: No change in US law, no data transfer deals – German state DPA h…… [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 3:33 am
Summy, and ultimately to Warner/Chappell Music. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 8:14 am
” Marya v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:35 am
King in the Central District of California has just established that Warner-Chappell do not hold any valid copyright in the Happy Birthday lyrics, Merpel recounts.* The "Happy Birthday" saga: when it may have been better not to have sued? [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 9:25 am
Chappel, smiting the long wait that comes before execution. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 10:42 am
Warner/Chappell claims to be a successor in interest to this assignment, but there is some dispute as to whether Warner/Chappell can establish a clear chain of title in the copyright from Clayton F. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 10:42 am
Warner/Chappell claims to be a successor in interest to this assignment, but there is some dispute as to whether Warner/Chappell can establish a clear chain of title in the copyright from Clayton F. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 7:56 pm
(credit: From court records in Good Morning to You v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 2:31 pm
Sit downToday, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal heard oral argument in the case of Jones v. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 11:00 am
25 Aug 2015, 9:09 am
8 Aug 2015, 4:20 am
": (Ray Charles Foundation v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 2:33 pm
27 Jul 2015, 11:10 am
Ostendorf and making explicit findings on each factor -- Where counsel is involved in conduct to be sanctioned Kozel analysis is required before entering judicial default, and failure to do so is, by itself, basis for remandDOROTHY CHAPPELLE, CALVIN JOHNSON and EVELYN WILLIAMS, Appellants, v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 10:48 am
Boyer v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 2:48 pm
Such petitions are subject to dismissal, see Rose v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:30 pm
This morning the Court announced its decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 4:50 pm
Other coverage of the decision comes from Pete Williams at NBC, Greg Stohr and David McLaughlin at Bloomberg Business, Samuel Hananel at the Associated Press (via The Washington Post), Lawrence Hurley at Reuters, Ariane de Vogue at CNN, Richard Wolf and Brad Heath at USA Today, Jess Bravin and Robbie Whalen at The Wall Street Journal, Adam Liptak at The New York Times, Timothy Phelps and David Savage at the Los Angeles Times, Bill Chappell at NPR’s The Two-Way blog, Chris Geidner at… [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 11:12 am
Chappell Appeal, August 26, 2014Jones v. [read post]
