Search for: "CHAPPELL v. CHAPPELL"
Results 141 - 160
of 305
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2015, 5:53 pm
Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 1:40 pm
Crittenden v. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 12:51 pm
Chappell. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 10:44 am
It's an AEDPA death penalty habeas case. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
-> What the groundbreaking Schrems v. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
Software Patents Back To The Fore in India http://t.co/sJtaooRu4A -> No Copyright in the title of a literary work says court in India http://t.co/Gft0Vbe6Vi -> Computer and Internet Updates for 2015-10-15 http://t.co/Py8qeCyjrf -> Here's Warner/Chappell's Plan to Save the "Happy Birthday" Copyright http://t.co/xp5qd2qic0 -> Computer and Internet Updates for 2015-10-15: No change in US law, no data transfer deals – German state DPA h…… [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 3:33 am
Summy, and ultimately to Warner/Chappell Music. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 8:14 am
” Marya v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:35 am
King in the Central District of California has just established that Warner-Chappell do not hold any valid copyright in the Happy Birthday lyrics, Merpel recounts.* The "Happy Birthday" saga: when it may have been better not to have sued? [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 9:25 am
Chappel, smiting the long wait that comes before execution. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 10:42 am
Warner/Chappell claims to be a successor in interest to this assignment, but there is some dispute as to whether Warner/Chappell can establish a clear chain of title in the copyright from Clayton F. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 10:42 am
Warner/Chappell claims to be a successor in interest to this assignment, but there is some dispute as to whether Warner/Chappell can establish a clear chain of title in the copyright from Clayton F. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 7:56 pm
(credit: From court records in Good Morning to You v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 2:31 pm
Sit downToday, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal heard oral argument in the case of Jones v. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 11:00 am
25 Aug 2015, 9:09 am
8 Aug 2015, 4:20 am
": (Ray Charles Foundation v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 2:33 pm
27 Jul 2015, 11:10 am
Ostendorf and making explicit findings on each factor -- Where counsel is involved in conduct to be sanctioned Kozel analysis is required before entering judicial default, and failure to do so is, by itself, basis for remandDOROTHY CHAPPELLE, CALVIN JOHNSON and EVELYN WILLIAMS, Appellants, v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 10:48 am
Boyer v. [read post]