Search for: "COATS v. STATE"
Results 141 - 160
of 853
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2019, 6:00 am
Key Findings Excessive tax rates on cigarettes approach de facto prohibition in some states, inducing black and gray market movement of tobacco products into high-tax states from low-tax states or foreign sources. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 8:47 am
Kansas will be voting on whether to restore the individual right to keep and bear arms to state constitution, undoing the judicial nullification in Salina v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 6:51 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Faith Stewart v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2011] EWCA Civ 907 (29 July 2011) Suckrajh, R (on the application of) v The Asylum & Immigration Tribunal & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 938 (29 July 2011) Iqbal v Ahmed [2011] EWCA Civ 900 (29 July 2011) Hayes v Merseyside Police [2011] EWCA Civ 911 (29 July 2011) Austin & Ors v Miller Argent (South Wales) Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 928 (29 July 2011) Modi… [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 7:32 pm
By Patrick ZiepoltIn Bailey v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 8:09 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 12:07 am
Licensing Corporation v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am
Key Findings: Excessive tax rates on cigarettes in some states induce substantial black and gray market movement of tobacco products into high-tax states from low-tax states or foreign sources. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 7:22 am
Serrano et al v. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 11:28 am
” It is well established in cases from Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 5:20 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 11:16 am
So far, there has only been one Colorado case, Coats v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 10:24 am
State v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 6:07 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 10:57 am
–Texas, LLC v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 5:26 pm
The case of Veronese v. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 8:52 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 4:48 pm
State of Washington (BTA docket no. 11-704), the Washington's Board of Tax Appeals (BTA) thoughtfully considered Sage V's commerce clause arguments and agreed with Sage V. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 2:09 am
The case is Case C-97/12 P Louis Vuitton Malletier v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Friis Group International ApS intervening, a ruling of the Eighth Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) of 15 May. [read post]
2 May 2015, 11:13 pm
The Appellate Division reversed the conviction, relying on a 2000 decision, State v. [read post]
