Search for: "CORRIGAN V US"
Results 141 - 160
of 181
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2009, 4:49 pm
On Friday, October 16, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court granted leave to appeal in Lighthouse Place Development, LLC v. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 12:20 pm
Justice Corrigan dissented for the reason that the grant of appeal is overbroad, especially in regards to issue one, which Justice Corrigan noted went beyond the facts of this case. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 6:56 pm
On Friday, September 25, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court denied leave to appeal in People v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 11:35 am
Apfelbaum, 445 US 115; People v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 1:49 pm
They have succeeded,” Corrigan wrote. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 4:10 am
Supreme Court held in Lefkowitz v Turley, 414 US 70, when a public employee is compelled to answer questions or face removal if he or she refuses to do so, the responses are cloaked with immunity automatically, and neither the compelled statements nor their fruits may be used against the employee in a subsequent criminal prosecution.Other decisions addressing the issue of requiring an individual to answer "job-related" question include Garner v… [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 11:35 am
On July 31, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court released its opinion in Hunter v. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 7:05 am
& Guaranty Co. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 7:00 pm
On July 21, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court in McNeil v. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 8:17 pm
Corrigan wrote. [read post]
20 Jun 2009, 6:50 am
More: Jean Seaton in the Guardian; Ray Corrigan; IPKat; Times itself. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 4:50 pm
Justices Corrigan and Young also noted that Caperton v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 12:36 pm
United States Issue: Did the Eleventh Circuit err in holding that petitioners did not establish a right to change venue and does a party’s failure to use all of its peremptory strikes to strike all minority members of the juror per se preclude a prima facie challenge under Batson v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 1:42 pm
The California Supreme Court ruled today in Strauss v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 10:53 am
In Strauss v. [read post]
12 Apr 2009, 10:09 am
She began by discussing how UCL is a powerful procedural tool, until she was asked by Justice Corrigan to speak slowly (Corrigan also joked about that her brain does not process info as fast as it used to). [read post]
14 Mar 2009, 12:13 am
Michigan and Kurts v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 8:24 pm
Co. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 4:15 am
Gardner v Broderick, 392 US 273 and People v Corrigan, 80 NY2d 326 discuss the parameters of immunity in connection with compelling a public officer or employee to answer questions concerning his or her performance of official duties.If, however, an individual fails to answer questions truthfully where he or she has use or transactional immunity, such immunity does not prevent the fact that he or she answered falsely from being used against the… [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 5:02 pm
In Van Horn v. [read post]
