Search for: "CP v. State"
Results 141 - 160
of 656
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2016, 5:05 pm
The Sun’s front page lead was “CPS you took a Helluva beating” and the paper demanded an apology. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 4:25 pm
On 27 April 2015, the CPS announced the charges on its website and its blog, stating, inter alia, that the CPS had concluded there was sufficient evidence and it was in the public interest to prosecute. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 7:34 am
However, it was held that the ‘public interest’ defence was made out in respect of all seven publications because they raised questions into the conduct of the CPS prosecution, whether there was sufficient evidence to prosecute the Defendant’s daughter and whether her vulnerable mental state was properly considered by the CPS before proceeding. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 4:20 pm
Irish cases subsequent to the Ryanair applications have shown the breadth of the Norwich Pharmacal jurisdiction (seeEMI v UPC [2013] IEHC 274 (12 June 2013) [cp EMI v Eircom [2005] 4 IR 148,[2005] IEHC 233 (8 July 2005)]; O’Brien v Red Flag Consulting Ltd [2015] IEHC 867 (21 December 2015); Petroceltic v Aut O’Mattic (above); see also Various Claimants v News Group Newspapers [2014] 1 Ch 400, [2013] EWHC 2119 (Ch) (12 July 2013)). [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 6:34 am
’ Clerk's Papers (CP) at 42. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 4:28 am
Article Four further stated as follows:As an extremely loving and devoted parent, I found that the love, care and concern which I lavished on my daughter was not acknowledged or returned in any way by my daughter. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 8:23 am
In State v. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 4:16 pm
By Kelly McClure In Philips v. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 4:16 pm
By Kelly McClure In Philips v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 9:18 am
United States v. [read post]
8 May 2016, 4:15 pm
Last week in the Courts On Tuesday 3 May 2016, HHJ Moloney QC heard an application in the case of Bukovsky v CPS. [read post]
1 May 2016, 4:02 pm
On the same day HHJ Moloney QC heard a PTR in the case of Ghuman v Ghuman. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 9:33 am
The New Jersey Appellate Division addressed this in its decision in New Jersey Div. of of Child Prot. and Permanency v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 6:53 am
On April 20, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:30 am
The same constitutional challenge was made in 2014 in State v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 2:11 pm
The granting of declaratory relief is pragmatic and discretionary and can assist in achieving justice between the parties (see Messier-Doughty v Sabena [2001] 1 All ER 275 and Financial Services Authority v Rourke [2002] CP Rep 14; see also Nokia Corp v Interdigital [2006] EWCH Civ 1618; [2007] FSR 23). [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 6:33 am
State v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 1:29 pm
It is certainly evidence of a crisis among the ruling elites in China; a crisis that parallels that in the United States about the legitimacy and character of the founding ideology of the state and its political order. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 12:04 pm
See State v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 12:08 pm
Bono v. [read post]
