Search for: "CROSS v. COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,765
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2022, 2:08 pm
Court of Appeal holding The Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court’s judgment and held that the non-solicitation agreement fell under the sale of business exception. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 12:30 pm
Dissent: The plaintiffs' claims are barred by Heck v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
Supreme Court overturn Roe v. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 9:13 am
Pick a theme and start referring to the case by the theme…it will catch on with everyone (whether they like it or not) I had a client once who couldn’t appear in court because he had to go to a conference in the redwood forests of California. [read post]
2 May 2022, 7:42 am
The hiQ v. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 12:03 pm
Robin Crest, et al. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 1:16 pm
District Court for the Central District of California did not hold any jury trials until May 2021. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 9:30 pm
Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 3:04 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals in the hotly anticipated and intensely important Epic Games v Apple case. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 9:27 am
Apple: Apple will file its opposition to Epic's Ninth Circuit appeal (as I discussed in the final two paragraphs of this recent post) as well as the opening argument for its own cross-appeal of Epic's consolation prize under California Unfair Competition Law.Follow @FOSSpatents Share with other professionals via LinkedIn: Share| [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 1:57 am
In one of the most important antitrust cases in the history of our industry, the Google Android case (one of several pending Google v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 6:56 am
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 9:13 am
Rules of Court, rule 8.204(a)(1)(B), San Joaquin River Exchange Contractors Water Authority v. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 11:28 am
/California Clean Energy Committee v. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 6:01 am
The central part of the 117-page opinion, captioned Texas v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 12:24 am
On 16 February 2022, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in ZXC v Bloomberg [2022] UKSC 5. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 10:32 am
On the other hand, other decisions from federal district courts in California have found that plaintiffs must do no more than plead the elements of a section 1595 claim, including in a case where a Jane Doe plaintiff sued the same defendants that Plaintiffs sue here—those entities that own and operate Pornhub—on very similar grounds. [read post]
12 Feb 2022, 5:42 am
” California Law Lawyers argue for a living. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 6:30 am
State Bar of California], or even overruling Keller and Lathrop [v. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 1:30 pm
’’ George Frank crossed out language in the addendum providing that he agreed to personally guarantee ‘‘any obligations that may become due. [read post]
