Search for: "CT Transportation, LLC" Results 141 - 160 of 217
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
  In addition, ranchers may not be able to avail themselves of the exemption, and the exemption may not cover fertilizers.[7] Facts of Cow Palace, LLC[8] The defendant operated a large concentrated animal feeding operation (CAFO) on its 800 acres with a herd of over 11,000, including over 7,000 milking cows. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 12:57 pm by Robert P. Merten III and Mike Le
Since then, the following decisions, rulings, and other notices were issued but uncertainty still abounds: FTB Technical Advice Memorandum No. 200658 (citing Amman & Schmid and holding that while an out-of-state LLC member receiving California-sourced income was subject to state income tax, it was not doing business for California franchise tax purposes).29 FTB Legal Ruling 2014-01 (reversing course, the FTB describes Amman & Schmid as a narrow exception not applicable to… [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Jordan Steinberg
While some companies have made the argument successfully that they had no knowledge of a partner’s intentions to transport their goods to New York (Ortiz v Food Mach. of Am., Inc.) (2014 NY Slip Op. 31868[U] [Bronx Ct. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
" The Court held open the possibility of "eccentric cases" in which the employee makes clear his approval of the conduct in conveying the information (for example, describing a racist joke as hilarious probably wouldn't count as opposing the joke-telling).o o January 26, 2009 decision hereo o SCOTUS docket hereo o SCOTUSwiki here14 Penn Plaza LLC v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
Take Hanley v Hanley, 2019 NY Slip Op 50970(U) [Sup Ct Albany County June 13, 2019], in which Justice Richard M. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 3:44 am by SHG
The agents nevertheless transported Ms. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 9:04 am by Beth Graham
Ct. 496 (2011) (Sonic I) (internal citations omitted); see also Securitas Sec. [read post]