Search for: "California Company v. Price"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,494
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2011, 9:40 am
Butcher v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 4:49 am
Lorenzo v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 12:30 pm
Examples include: Evidence in the Doe v. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 8:10 pm
This morning I updated my Q&A on the ongoing Apple v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
In Quality King, L’anza Research International, a California shampoo company, sold to foreign distributors at rates which were 35% to 40% lower than the prices charged to its domestic distributors. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 10:36 am
California Capital Ins. [read post]
16 Dec 2024, 7:32 am
On Monday the justices denied review in Ohio v. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 9:48 pm
Burlage v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 8:41 am
The takeaway from the decision is that a company would need to show how it was harmed, for instance, a decline in revenue, say, or a falling stock price. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 5:55 am
In SEC v. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 1:48 pm
The company’s share price declined 18% on this news, after smaller declines in connection with the prior company statements. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 5:00 am
Therefore, the California Supreme Court has concluded “that to violate section 17043, a company must act with the purpose, i.e., the desire, of injuring competitors or destroying competition. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 3:00 am
Nestle USA, Inc., a group of plaintiffs filed a putative class action in California state court against the defendant Gerber Products Company (“Gerber”). [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
In January 2012, the Supreme Court held in United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 8:50 am
” Defendants Bouncing Angels and EZ Inflatables (“EZI”) are both small California companies that also manufacture inflatables. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 2:23 pm
With the long weekend, there hasn't been much from the Ninth Circuit or California Court of Appeal lately. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 11:30 am
Co. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 8:11 pm
Schachter v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm
In Schachter v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
In Quality King, L’anza Research International, a California shampoo company, sold to foreign distributors at rates which were 35% to 40% lower than the prices charged to its domestic distributors. [read post]
