Search for: "California v. Lord" Results 141 - 160 of 304
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2019, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
On 24 January 2019 the UK Supreme Court (Lords Reed and Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin) will hear the appeal in the case of Stocker v Stocker. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 3:26 pm by Aaron Moss
Meanwhile, the Tolkien Estate proceeded to file its own copyright infringement lawsuit against Polychron, and Central District of California Judge Stephen V. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 8:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Also, there was a House of Lords decision in 1891, Mobil v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 6:00 am by Bruce Nye
Superior Court (Lords) (April 25, 2011) ___Cal.App.4th___ (Fourth Dist., G043650). [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 4:16 pm by skelly
This first action was quickly followed by an action in California, French Laundry Partners, LP dba French Laundry, et al. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
There are no new PCC adjudications this week, but four new resolved PCC cases: Mr Johnny Dean v NME NME, Clause 3, 25/01/2013; Mr Ian Calland v Golf Monthly, Clause 1, 24/01/2013; Mr Martin Jones v Reading Post, Clause 1, 24/01/2013 and Dame Tessa Jowell v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 24/01/2013. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
Lord Justice Leveson has invited any further applications for Core Participant status for Module Two on relationships between the press and police – to be submitted by 13 January 2012. [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:06 am by Mandelman
  And the law firm employed by Wells Fargo to wrongfully foreclose on this 73 year-old widow’s home of 43 years, Anglin, Flewelling, Rasmussen, Campbell & Trytten, LLP of Pasadena, California, could have stopped this travesty of justice as well, but these lawyers can’t even be bothered to actually appear in the courtroom, choosing instead to phone in their odious nuggets of legal claptrap, entirely devoid of common sense, because that’s how they roll. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 8:18 am
In September, 2008, the ACLU asked the federal appeals court in California to reinstate the lawsuit. [read post]
17 May 2020, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
Thomas made a submission to the House of Lords Committee on Communications and Digital’s inquiry into the future of journalism, making his comments about the industry alongside representatives from publishing companies, academics and journalists. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 6:33 am
(The Product Naming Blog)   US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Decisions District Court C D California: Federal registration owned by someone else no defense to cybersquatting: Monex Deposit Co. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 12:15 am by INFORRM
On 24 October 2019 there will be an application in the case of Lord Sheikh v Associated Newspapers. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 12:12 am by GuestPost
” And as Lord Bingham went on to note in R (on the application of Laporte) v Chief Constable of Gloucestershire Constabulary, the essence of breach of the peace in Howell “was to be found in violence or threatened violence”. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 11:20 am
"The Defendant raised the same dual criminality challenge as well as others [8] before the District Court in California. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
: An Analysis of the California Consumer Privacy Act and Its Effects on Nationwide Data Protection Laws, 11 Hastings J. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 7:53 am by Adam Chandler
Schwarzenegger, the constitutional challenge to California’s Prop 8. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 2:39 pm by Kashmir Hill
Last year, two Washington lawyers actually let me set them up on a V-Day date. [read post]