Search for: "California v. Lord"
Results 141 - 160
of 304
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Nov 2014, 2:36 pm
” (Sagaser v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Law Div. 2005).Heeding presumptions are something that exists in some states (Massachusetts, Missouri, Oklahoma), doesn’t in others (California, Connecticut, Alabama), and is limited in still others (New, Jersey, Pennsylvania, Texas). [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
In dissent in Petrella v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 10:40 am
However, the ninth federal US circuit has extended the laches doctrine to bar both legal and equitable claims (see DANJAQ, LLC v Sony Corp., 263 F.3d 942, 962 (9th Cir. 2001)), while other federal circuits reject laches as a absolute defence to copyright legal claims: see Lyons P’ship LP v Morris Costumes Inc., 243 F.3d 789, 797 (4th Cir. 2001) and Chirco v Crosswinds Communities Inc., 474 F.3d 227, 234 (6th Cir. 2007). [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 10:59 pm
Apple is suing Samsung in California over "slide to unlock", but a little-known Swedish touchscreen phone, the Neonode N1m, already had that feature (though Apple's version undoubtedly has a more elaborate graphical representation) well before the iPhone was launched:For the most part the Apple v. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 5:30 am
http://t.co/uh4sqGyvPW -> ALJ Lord Grants Motion For Summary Determination Of No Copyright Infringement In Certain TV Programs http://t.co/rfG4i1r2iS -> ECommerce vendor not entitled to DMCA hosting safe harbor Gardner v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 10:06 am
One case from 1909 where House of Lords first recognized “goodwill”—involved Spaulding, an American company making sports goods. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 4:19 pm
Marley v. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 12:16 pm
Janis Joplin sang, “Lord, won’t you buy me a Mercedes Benz”; the law rightly did not require her to sing, “Lord, won’t you buy me a generic expensive car” instead. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 6:37 am
This talk focused on the efficiency and functionality of the enforcement mechanism, the judge citing the dictum of Lord Esher MR (right) in Ungar v Sugg "“... that a man had better have his patent infringed, or have anything happen to him in this world, short of losing all his family by influenza, than have a dispute about a patent". [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 4:37 am
Yordy v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Emody v. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 2:33 pm
FANTASY AND HARRISONGS V. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 4:30 am
O’Connor, Francis V., ed. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:38 am
Constitutional Affairs, Equalities, Home Affairs, Justice and Law – Lord McNally/Lord Taylor of Holbeach, Main Chamber, House of Lords.. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
Morales The inspiration for the bill that is currently being considered in California is the case of People v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:36 am
The biggest news of the week is that the Defamation Bill received Royal Assent and is now the Defamation Act 2013, three years after the publication of Lord Lester’s original Defamation Bill. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:56 am
As Inforrm noted here, in a post examining the detail of the Amendments, there were 16 Lords Amendments. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 8:06 pm
Last month the California Supreme Court issued an opinion (Bourhis v. [read post]
