Search for: "California v. Russell" Results 141 - 160 of 750
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2013, 7:28 am by Allison Trzop
California should be overruled. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 1:38 am by Christa Culver
Note: Goldstein, Howe & Russell represents the petitioner in this case, which is listed without regard to its likelihood of being granted.Title: Zuress v. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
” NFIB weighs in on Knick v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 4:06 am by Edith Roberts
Richard Re analyzes Monday’s opinion in Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 4:04 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
Abbott, Diane Kindermann, Glen Hansen, Brian Russell and Dan Cucchi Welcome to Abbott & Kindermann’s 2017 2nd Quarter cumulative CEQA update. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 5:35 am by Amy Howe
  And in the third decision of the day, Burrage v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 4:41 am by Rachel Sachs
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 3:35 am by Amy Howe
More coverage of Monday’s grants in Moore v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:53 am by Kiran Bhat
HR.BLR reports on a recent decision by California’s intermediate appellate court, in the wake of the Court’s recent decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm by Maureen Johnston
Superior Court of California, Orange County 13-956Issue: Whether the California Court of Appeal erred when it deepened an acknowledged circuit split and held—contrary to this Court's decisions in Buckman Co. v. [read post]
27 May 2013, 7:05 am by Marissa Miller
  Buzzfeed’s Chris Geidner discusses the prospect that, if the Court does not strike down California’s Proposition 8 on Equal Protection Clause grounds in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 5:58 am by Amy Howe
” [Disclosure:  Kevin Russell of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in Fernandez. [read post]
8 May 2017, 4:47 pm by Nate Russell
California: Modern cell phones are not just another technological convenience. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 6:01 am by Rachel, Law Clerk and Office Manager
Voting Rights for Non-Residents at Issue in Frank v CanadaShould apologies be admissible in court? [read post]