Search for: "Campus v. State"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,898
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2023, 8:20 am
In Hurley v. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am
NAACP v. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 1:08 pm
Khan v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 11:05 am
The committee, however, stayed the disciplinary proceedings against the plaintiff pending the outcome of a criminal case that the state had filed against him. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 4:01 am
Here is the complaint: Johnson v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 2:42 pm
From Lee v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 8:42 am
v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 12:19 pm
Facts: This case (Pogorzelska v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 12:30 pm
His dad sues, alleging the suspension for off-campus speech violates the First Amendment. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 8:57 am
Johnson County CC * Sending Politically Charged Emails Does Not Support Disturbing the Peace Conviction — State v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 8:41 am
The adjuncts' presence on campus tends to be accepted as a given. [read post]
31 May 2023, 8:56 am
The post Georgia Campus Carry Rules Upheld Against State Constitutional Separation of Powers Challenge appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
30 May 2023, 5:02 pm
(Citing Sagaser v. [read post]
29 May 2023, 9:01 pm
As Justice Alito’s 2017 majority opinion in Matal v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 6:15 am
The law also specifically bars any Chinese foreign principals from purchasing any real estate whatsoever in the state, with limited exceptions for residential property by those lawfully present in the United States. [read post]
23 May 2023, 6:10 am
See Wichita State Univ. [read post]
22 May 2023, 5:53 am
”] From R.H. v. [read post]
21 May 2023, 3:39 pm
On May 17, 2020, the California Supreme Court granted review of the First District Court of Appeal’s controversial and much criticized published decision in Make UC a Good Neighbor v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 9:00 pm
Putting aside rights that arise from contractual or other state-law guarantees of academic freedom, if a public employee is speaking (even on matters of public concern) while on the job, qua employee, then under the 2006 Supreme Court Garcetti v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:01 pm
G expressed disagreement with the core of ISL—that elected state legislatures were freed of the state constitutions that created those very legislatures by virtue of something in the federal Constitution. [read post]