Search for: "Caplan v. Caplan" Results 141 - 160 of 199
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Law and Media Round Up – 21 November 2011 [Updated]
20 Nov 2011, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
The Daily Mail’s counsel, Jonathan Caplan, argued that the paper’s data requests outlined in the ‘What Price Privacy Now‘ report (2006) were legal. [read post]
Inforrm's Blog - http://inforrm.wordpress.com
Another New York Times Piece Regarding Prosecutorial Misconduct in the New Orleans DA Office: In Re Smith v. Cain
17 Nov 2011, 11:51 am by ebcarpenter
Lincoln Caplan, one of the board’s legal writers, explains below: Mr. [read post]
New Orleans Criminal Defense Attorney Blog - http://www.neworleans-criminal-defense.com/attorney-blog/
Monday round-up
24 Oct 2011, 7:41 am by Joshua Matz
  At ACSblog, Marco Simons discusses Kiobel v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
A judge may disregard the child support guidelines in certain situations, one of which is annual income in excess of $187,200
8 Oct 2011, 10:40 am by PaulKostro
Strahan v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
The decision to impute income is a discretionary matter, wherein the judge must endeavor to determine not only ability to earn income but also the availability of employment
8 Oct 2011, 10:33 am by PaulKostro
Caplan v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
An assessment of change of circumstances must be holistic — the analysis must consider not only the income set forth on tax returns but the economic interests of the parties that, if not utilized as current income, provide resources, both real and potenti
20 Aug 2011, 9:14 am by PaulKostro
Caplan supra, 364 N.J. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
Where family income exceeds the maximum amount under the guidelines, the court has discretion to calculate child support using the maximum support under the guidelines and combine that preliminary figure with a supplemental award
11 Aug 2011, 4:33 am by PaulKostro
Caplan, supra, 182 N.J. at 271. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
While a percentage increase in income is an important factor in determining a support obligation, it is not exclusive and does not relieve the trial judge of performing the required analysis prescribed by the statute and case law
11 Aug 2011, 4:31 am by PaulKostro
Caplan, 182 N.J. 250, 271 (2005), and Pascale v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
In deciding if income should be imputed, the judge must determine whether the spouse has just cause for remaining voluntarily unemployed or underemployed
2 Aug 2011, 8:50 am by PaulKostro
Caplan v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
The imputation of additional income to either party may be unlikely where both parties were working full-time
29 Jun 2011, 12:13 pm by PaulKostro
See, e.g., Caplan v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
Spousal support agreements are always subject to modification upon a showing of changed circumstances
17 May 2011, 10:27 am by PaulKostro
Bonanno, 4 N.J. 268, 275 (1950); see also Caplan v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
In deciding if income should be imputed, the judge must determine whether the spouse has just cause for remaining voluntarily unemployed or underemployed
14 May 2011, 2:55 am by PaulKostro
Caplan v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
Confirming Validity of the Attorney Document
4 May 2011, 3:00 am by Hull and Hull LLP
The much discussed case of Reviczky v. [read post]
Toronto Estate Law Blog - http://estatelaw.hullandhull.com/
Where custody is equally shared, presumptions can present a distorted picture of likely expenditures for the child
21 Mar 2011, 1:11 pm by PaulKostro
’” Caplan v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
November 18 roundup
18 Nov 2010, 4:29 am by Walter Olson
[Brandon Murrill, William & Mary Law Review, PDF] Blonds not protected class under federal employment discrimination law, judge declares [six years ago on Overlawyered] Tags: alcohol, claims fraud, First Amendment, small business, Supreme Court Related posts “I’ve always thought people would be very concerned if they knew what we were doing” (0) Wyeth v. [read post]
Overlawyered - http://www.overlawyered.com/
The fairness of a child support award is dependent on the accurate assessment of a parent’s net income
2 Nov 2010, 12:16 pm by PaulKostro
See Caplan v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
New Volume: Yearbook on International Investment Law & Policy
1 Nov 2010, 9:17 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
Gormley, Using dynamic petroleum contract clauses to manage risk in volatile marketsEmmanuelle Cabrol, Pren Nreka v. [read post]
International Law Reporter - http://ilreports.blogspot.com/
When Income is Over the Limit for Guidelines, A Court Cannot Extroplate from The Guidelines
29 Oct 2010, 5:22 am by Eric S. Solotoff
" Pascale v. [read post]
NJ Family Legal Blog - http://njfamilylaw.foxrothschild.com/
Child support in high income cases
28 Oct 2010, 9:59 am by PaulKostro
Caplan v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
Friday round-up
22 Oct 2010, 9:01 am by Kali Borkoski
At Slate, Lincoln Caplan touches on themes of interest in the biography of the late Justice. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/