Search for: "Chew v. State"
Results 141 - 160
of 322
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2017, 12:07 am
The UK Court of Appeal took this matter on earlier this summer, giving trademark holders something to chew on.The case of Glaxo Wellcome UK Ltd (t/a Allen & Hanburys) v Sandoz Ltd concerned a trademark registration for an asthma inhaler, and more specifically, its color scheme. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:31 pm
Google is a big deal, but we will cover it in detail once the Justices have chewed it over. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 5:03 pm
Merck v Merck: what you think ... so far. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 7:20 am
Megan also covers Congress’s “TayTay v. [read post]
9 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm
[On Tuesday, April 4, Georgetown Law devoted a session of its faculty workshop to honoring the publication of The Hughes Court: From Progressivism to Pluralism, 1930-1941 (Cambridge University Press, 2022), a volume in the Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise History of the Supreme Court of the United States, by Mark V. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 6:44 pm
“Engle progeny” refers to tobacco lawsuits stemming from Engle v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 11:30 am
Lee: The Supreme Court Case that Influenced the Play “A Raisin in the Sun” An Interview with Seongryeol (Ryan) Park, Foreign Law Intern Chew Heong v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:37 am
VIP Products LLC ARGUED: 3/22/2023 This case involves the design and branding of a line of humorous dog chew toys that resemble familiar trademarks. [read post]
5 May 2016, 1:54 pm
See State v. [read post]
5 May 2016, 1:54 pm
See State v. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 6:00 am
State v. [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 7:39 am
State v. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 5:09 pm
So imagine my glee upon reading the (sadly unpublished) opinion in Miller v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 7:27 pm
We should learn to walk and chew gum at the same time. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 8:05 pm
Hilario v. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 10:48 am
Or simply state there's a §109(e) exclusion. [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 5:06 am
Now, on appeal, in Garber v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 9:00 pm
Williams v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 2:17 am
The Complainant in PETSENSE, Inc. v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
