Search for: "Child v. Social Security Administration" Results 141 - 160 of 543
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2020, 7:38 am by Cyberleagle
There are two exceptions to that: there will be codes of practice around child sexual exploitation and terrorist content, because those are both illegal. [read post]
17 May 2020, 4:48 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
That role involves a balancing act of duties towards the client, the administration of justice and even the child before the court. 107. [read post]
17 May 2020, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
The one-hour deadline applies to content that French authorities consider to be related to terrorism or child sexual abuse. [read post]
14 May 2020, 7:48 pm by Karen T. Willitts, Esq.
In 2002, also during the marriage, the Social Security Administration determined that the Defendant was disabled by multiple sclerosis. [read post]
6 May 2020, 11:04 am by Jessica C. Diamond
  Also during the marriage, the Wife was declared permanently disabled by the Social Security Administration (“SSA”) and did not work. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 11:23 pm by Matthias Weller
Second, it will touch upon the right of the child to be heard in all civil and administrative proceedings which concern its interest, pursuant to Article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child and how this right is regarded in remote proceedings in the context of the COVID-19 situation. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
IPSO IPSO had a blog post “Social media and journalism during COVID-19”. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 7:25 pm
Since then, the American people have united behind a policy of mitigation strategies, including social distancing, to flatten the curve of infections and reduce the spread of SARS--CoV--2, the virus that causes COVID-19. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 6:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
Taxpayers may claim a maximum credit of $2,000 for each child, with a portion of the credit refundable. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 5:40 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
In a new decision in Simcoe Muskoka Child and Youth Family Services v. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 9:48 am
--In this section: (1) The term ``eligible child'' means a child (as defined in section 12(d) or served under section 11(a)(1) of the Richard B. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
IICSA report calls for social media firms to be forced to pre-screen all uploaded material to help law enforcement agencies cope with the “explosion” in online child sexual abuse in the UK. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 5:18 am
—In this section: (1) The term “eligible child” means a child (as defined in section 12(d) or served under section 11(a)(1) of the Richard B. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
The Factum Alcohol & AdvocacyRoncarelli v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 2:10 am by Public Employment Law Press
Further, the Appellate Division opined that  Defendant's assertions that Retirement and Social Security Law §110 and Administrative Code of the City of New York §13-264 protected his pension from assignment to satisfy plaintiff's money judgment "are similarly without merit due to the broad reach of the Son of Sam Law. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 2:10 am by Public Employment Law Press
Further, the Appellate Division opined that  Defendant's assertions that Retirement and Social Security Law §110 and Administrative Code of the City of New York §13-264 protected his pension from assignment to satisfy plaintiff's money judgment "are similarly without merit due to the broad reach of the Son of Sam Law. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 11:57 am by Hannah Kris, William Ford
Tuesday, Jan. 14, 10:00 a.m.: The House Homeland Security Subcommittee on Border Security, Facilitation and Operations will hold a hearing assessing the adequacy of the Department of Homeland Security's efforts to prevent child deaths in custody. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 10:11 am by Lindsay A. Heller
  Defendant was determined disabled by the Social Security Administration (SSA) in 2002 and was out of the workforce since that time. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 10:11 am by Lindsay A. Heller
  Defendant was determined disabled by the Social Security Administration (SSA) in 2002 and was out of the workforce since that time. [read post]