Search for: "City of Sacramento v. State of California"
Results 141 - 160
of 249
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2012, 11:19 am
By Michael Kiely and Phillip Tate On December 29, 2011, legislation to dissolve all redevelopment agencies became effective when the California Supreme Court released its opinion in California Redevelopment Association v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 10:51 pm
The Eastern District (Sacramento) doesn't matter for tech cases. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 9:30 am
For more about this ethical duty in eminent domain cases, see, e.g., City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 12:02 pm
Public Safety Realignment) allowing the early release of thousands of state prison inmates, Associate Justice Alito wrote a dissent in the Supreme Court case of Brown v. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 11:55 am
(2) During arguments, Justice Carlos Moreno had an interesting exchange that had echoes of Brown v. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 8:34 am
The California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS), the California State Teachers' Retirement System (CalSTRS), the Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds, the Colorado Public Employees' Retirement Association, the Washington State Investment Board, five New York City pension funds, the Council of Institutional Investors (CII), and the United Kingdom-based Universities Superannuation Scheme and Hermes Equity Ownership… [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 6:11 pm
Specifically, the government alleged anticompetitive effects in eight relevant geographic markets for the sale of sliced bread: Los Angeles, Sacramento, San Diego, and San Francisco in California; Kansas City, Kansas; Omaha, Nebraska; Oklahoma City, Oklahoma; and the Harrisburg/Scranton area in Pennsylvania.Under the proposed consent decree, which is subject to court approval, the companies must divest the rights to sell Sara Lee’s EarthGrains brand and… [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 8:52 am
The good news is that the California Legislature is being proactive on this front, too, petitioning the California Supreme Court in Legislature of the State of California v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 5:21 am
City of Sacramento, 534 F.3d 1106, 1111 (9th Cir. 2008) (‘Lawyers must eat, so they generally won’t take cases without a reasonable prospect of getting paid. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
“Not since Bush v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 8:39 am
City of Long Beach. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 3:00 am
California et al. v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 6:10 am
” Elsewhere, opinion columnist Mary Sanchez of the Kansas City Star (via the Miami Herald) warns that “no state is free of the mentality that led California to this juncture. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
Sacramento v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 3:36 am
Today the Court will hear oral arguments in City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 6:59 am
Seven pimps were arrested there, he added.Following Seattle were Tacoma, Washington, and Sacramento, California, each with seven child prostitutes retrieved by authorities, Pack said. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 10:40 am
” County of Sacramento v. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 7:58 pm
The case is Environmental Council of Sacramento v. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 10:26 am
California Water Impact Network v. [read post]
