Search for: "Clark v. Secretary of State" Results 141 - 160 of 369
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
As if Michael Gove MP needed further reminding, in wake of Colin Yeo’s appearance on World at One on Wednesday where he pointed out the fundamental error of the Justice Secretary’s assertion that Britain cannot deport EEA nationals with a criminal record, the Supreme Court in R (Nouazli) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] UKSC 16 makes clear that EEA nationals can be deported by virtue of the Immigration (European Economic Area)… [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 2:10 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Northern Ireland); HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12–14 January 2016. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 3:13 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Northern Ireland); HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12–14 January 2016. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 1:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Northern Ireland); HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12–14 January 2016. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 1:47 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Northern Ireland); HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12–14 January 2016. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The trial in TLT and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department began on Monday 20 June 2016 and was completed on 23 June, with judgment being given on 24 June 2016. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 12:50 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
MS (Uganda) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
9 May 2016, 12:05 am by Anthony Fairclough
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Northern Ireland); HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12-14 January 2016. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
In regards to the proportionality argument, Lord Clarke stated that, in this case, the absence of a specified time limit for detention does not infringe the principles in R v Governor of Durham Prison, Ex P Hardial Singh [1984] 1 WLR 704. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 10:54 am by Andrew Hamm
After receiving Jay’s notice, Adams chose Secretary of State John Marshall, who happened to be in his office at the time. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 6:14 am by Andrew Hamm
The day before the Court released its 1919 opinion in United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 4:45 am by Sean O'Beirne, Kingsley Napley LLP
On 23 November 2015 the Supreme Court heard a two day appeal of the decision in R (Nouazli) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] EWCA Civ 1608. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 11:59 am
Clark (President gets to decide whether other countries’ tariffs are fair), Mahler v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 2:00 am by Sam Claydon, Olswang LLP
  Lord Clarke gave a dissenting judgment, with which Lady Hale agreed. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 2:00 am by Ayesha Christie, Matrix
Supreme Court majority decision Before the Supreme Court, the PSNI and the Secretary of State accepted that the indefinite retention of a person’s DNA profile, fingerprints and photograph interfered with the Appellant’s article 8 rights [1]. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 8:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Clark is a civ pro legend. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 1:00 am by Guy Stuckey-Clarke, Olswang LLP
In November 2000, the High Court (Laws LJ and Gibbs J) gave judgment in favour of Mr Bancoult, a Chagos Islander, in granting a High Court order quashing the Immigration Ordinance 1971, s 4; see R (Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2001] QB 1067 (“Bancoult (1)”). [read post]