Search for: "Clark v. Wells" Results 141 - 160 of 1,826
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2022, 7:51 am by Eugene Volokh
In February, my UCLA First Amendment Amicus Brief Clinic student Pauline Alarcon and I were appointed by District Judge Stephen Clark (E.D. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 7:10 pm by Bill Marler
MARLER of MARLER CLARK, LLP (pending admission pro hac vice), pursuant to MCR 2.118(A)(1), to allege and state as follows: I. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Lina M. Khan
How can we best ensure that any rules that we pursue can be easily and efficiently administered and that these rules do not rest on determinations that we are not well positioned to make or commitments that we are not well positioned to police? [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 3:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
A: Indian gov’t wanted films made from well-known Bengali novels. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 10:15 am by bndmorris
Wade Should be Overruled is cited in the following article: Clarke D. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:42 am by Emma Snell
The office of Inspector General Joseph V. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A Record Number of Trans and Nonbinary People Are Running for Office MSN – Anne Branigan (Washington Post) | Published: 7/27/2022 In 2017, former journalist Danica Roem made history when she was elected to the Virginia House of Delegates, making her the first out transgender state legislator in the U.S. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 5:43 am by Bernard Bell
Faced with such a dilemma, Congress might well have no choice but to opt for even more capacious delegations. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 12:47 am by Frank Cranmer
: on the recent decisions in Onuoha v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust and Kovalkovs v 2 Sisters Food Group Limited. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm by INFORRM
And, in Dunnes Stores v Ryan [2002] IEHC 61 (5 June 2002), Kearns J in the High Court struck down section 19(6) of the Companies Act, 1990 (also here), which required a company to provide an explanation or make a statement to an officer making inquiries about the company, on the grounds, inter alia, that it infringed the right to silence implied into Article 40.6.1(i) (a right now being relocated to Article 38.1 of the Constitution insofar as it relates to… [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The decision followed negotiations between Cipollone and the committee, as well as escalating pressure on him in recent days to testify. [read post]