Search for: "Cohen v. Davis"
Results 141 - 160
of 326
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2008, 6:31 pm
Stephen Schuster of the Superior Court of Cobb County in Marietta, Georgia, and lawyers David Givelber and Nancy Lawler, both of Cohen, Pollock, Merlin & Small in Atlanta, took the audience through the esoteric but increasingly more important topic of challenging expert witnesses under the Daubert rule (named after one of the litigants in the case of Daubert v. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 3:55 am
Davis & Gilbert, LLP, 126 AD3d 656, 656 (1st Dep’t 2015); Stackpole v. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 4:16 am
(See Davis v Cohen & Gresser LLP, 160 AD3d 484 [l51 Dept2018] [plaintiff bears burden of showing that statute of limitations has been tolled or does not apply]). [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 4:27 pm
For wage and hour attorneys, Wednesday's hearing in Murphy v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
In Frisby v. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 3:58 am
At the Brennan Center, Andrew Cohen writes that the Supreme Court’s decision last week in Flowers v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:01 pm
Johnston v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 4:32 am
” At National Law Review, Donald Davis looks at the court’s decision last week in Digital Realty Trust Inc. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
SB 1272 submits the following question (designated by the California Secretary of State as Proposition 49) to the California electorate for its input: Shall the Congress of the United States propose, and the California Legislature ratify, an amendment or amendments to the United States Constitution to overturn Citizens United v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
This was true in Rumsfeld v. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 7:30 am
” Davis echoes this theory in another story for the AP. [read post]
31 May 2018, 9:01 pm
In the seminal McCulloch v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 3:26 am
The aspects of the contingency fee retainer agreement prepared by defendants and signed by plaintiff that allegedly render it noncompliant with 22 NYCRR 1215.1 do not bar defendants from recovering in quantum meruit (see Seth Rubenstein, P.C. v Ganea, 41 AD3d 54, 60-64 [2007]; see also Egnotovich v Katten Muchin Zavis & Roseman LLP, 55 AD3d 462, 464 [2008]; Nicoll & Davis LLP v Ainetchi, 52 AD3d 412 [2008]). [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 4:55 pm
Last year, Davies publicly accused Kurd of plagiarising a gag that compares a smart fridge to a nagging wife. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 4:23 am
Co. v Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, 56 AD3d 1, 11 [1st Dept 2008]). [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
The Sebelius v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 9:01 pm
Unlike Near, in New York Times Co. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Parke, Davis & Co., 256 F.3d 1013, 1021 (10th Cir. 2001) (wrong to “construe [a treater’s] ‘heeding’ an adequate warning to mean [s/he] would have given the warning”) (applying Oklahoma law); In re Diet Drug Litigation, 895 A.2d 480, 490-91 (N.J. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court said in Karcher v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 12:00 pm
Early Republic Borderlands: Indian Removal, Slavery, and Non-State ActorsChair: David Waldstreicher, Temple University “Fraught with Disastrous Consequences for our Country”: Cherokee Removal and Nullification, 1824–1839, Nancy Morgan, Temple University Women at the Crossroads: The Legal and Political Fight to Reverse Indian Removal in Seneca, 1838–1887, Taylor Spence, Yale University Reading Hearts, Not Books: Affective Literacy and Public Sentiment in David… [read post]
