Search for: "Cohen v. Davis" Results 141 - 160 of 316
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2018, 4:16 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
(See Davis v Cohen & Gresser LLP, 160 AD3d 484 [l51 Dept2018] [plaintiff bears burden of showing that statute of limitations has been tolled or does not apply]). [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 4:27 pm
For wage and hour attorneys, Wednesday's hearing in Murphy v. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
At the Brennan Center, Andrew Cohen writes that the Supreme Court’s decision last week in Flowers v. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 7:30 am by Erin Miller
”   Davis echoes this theory in another story for the AP. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
” At National Law Review, Donald Davis looks at the court’s decision last week in Digital Realty Trust Inc. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
SB 1272 submits the following question (designated by the California Secretary of State as Proposition 49) to the California electorate for its input: Shall the Congress of the United States propose, and the California Legislature ratify, an amendment or amendments to the United States Constitution to overturn Citizens United v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 3:26 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The aspects of the contingency fee retainer agreement prepared by defendants and signed by plaintiff that allegedly render it noncompliant with 22 NYCRR 1215.1 do not bar defendants from recovering in quantum meruit (see Seth Rubenstein, P.C. v Ganea, 41 AD3d 54, 60-64 [2007]; see also Egnotovich v Katten Muchin Zavis & Roseman LLP, 55 AD3d 462, 464 [2008]; Nicoll & Davis LLP v Ainetchi, 52 AD3d 412 [2008]). [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
Last year, Davies publicly accused Kurd of plagiarising a gag that compares a smart fridge to a nagging wife. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 4:23 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co. v Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, 56 AD3d 1, 11 [1st Dept 2008]). [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Parke, Davis & Co., 256 F.3d 1013, 1021 (10th Cir. 2001) (wrong to “construe [a treater’s] ‘heeding’ an adequate warning to mean [s/he] would have given the warning”) (applying Oklahoma law); In re Diet Drug Litigation, 895 A.2d 480, 490-91 (N.J. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 12:00 pm by Karen Tani
Early Republic Borderlands: Indian Removal, Slavery, and Non-State ActorsChair: David Waldstreicher, Temple University  “Fraught with Disastrous Consequences for our Country”: Cherokee Removal and Nullification, 1824–1839, Nancy Morgan, Temple University  Women at the Crossroads: The Legal and Political Fight to Reverse Indian Removal in Seneca, 1838–1887, Taylor Spence, Yale University Reading Hearts, Not Books: Affective Literacy and Public Sentiment in David… [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Courts can revisit their prior rulings, higher courts can change the legal landscape against which lower courts make decisions (as the Supreme Court in fact did in the immigration regulation setting in 2012 in Arizona v. [read post]