Search for: "Coker v. Coker" Results 141 - 160 of 217
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2008, 11:49 pm
Stebbins, 61 M.J. 366, 368 (C.A.A.F. 2005) (holding that LWOP is an authorized punishment for rape regardless of Coker's applicability); United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 10:38 am
Supreme Court had previously resolved the issue of the death penalty for rape of an adult in Coker v. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 4:08 am
The Louisiana Supreme Court, however, ruled on May 22 that the Supreme Court's 1977 decision barring capital punishment for rape (Coker v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 8:05 pm
Louisiana filled in a detail  hinted at in Coker v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 3:12 pm
The Court struck down the death penalty for raping an adult in the 1977 case Coker v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 1:05 pm by Orin Kerr
Louisiana filled in a detail  hinted at in Coker v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 1:20 am
See, e.g., Tison v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 9:01 pm
  But there is a definite trend line: following nullification of the death penalty for  the rape of an adult woman (Coker v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:44 pm
It continues a pattern in the court, beginning with the 1977 Coker v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:44 pm
It continues a pattern in the court, beginning with the 1977 Coker v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:44 pm
It continues a pattern in the court, beginning with the 1977 Coker v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:44 pm
It continues a pattern in the court, beginning with the 1977 Coker v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 4:14 pm
As I will explain, dicta in this Court's decision in Coker v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 3:48 pm
  The Court, in 1977's Coker v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 3:06 pm
As the opinion states:The existence of objective indicia of consensus against making a crime punishable by death was a relevant concern in Roper, Atkins, Coker, and Enmund, and we follow the approach of those cases here. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 2:11 pm
  The broad dicta in that case, Alito said, was not supported by all of those in the majority in Coker v. [read post]