Search for: "Collings v. State"
Results 141 - 160
of 296
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Nov 2014, 4:35 am
U.S. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 4:12 am
Coll. of Veterinary Sports Med. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:03 am
"Elizabeth Helen Coll v. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 4:43 pm
In United States v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 1:19 pm
Coll., 56 Mass. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 4:00 am
DiBella, [Not be published in the Official Reports.]The general view of the Freedom of Information Law is that "The Legislature enacted FOIL to provide the public with a means of access to governmental records in order to encourage public awareness and understanding of and participation in government and to discourage official secrecy" (Matter of Alderson v New York State Coll. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
The Charter does not directly apply here as no state action is being challenged, although the Charter may inform the development of the common law. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 7:48 am
When 33-year-old Rogelio V. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:52 am
Nevertheless, the newspaper repeated the defamation: in an article alongside a photograph of Watters the newspaper had stated: We may have to apologise to this revolting pervert but will we mean it? [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
Corp. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:56 pm
Louisiana, 14-280 (third relist since the Court received the state’s brief in opposition); Tolliver v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:24 pm
., United States Patent and Trademark Office). [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 11:25 pm
"This is a sign that they are recognizing Acer's threat, but it should not affect Acer's financials," said Kwock.IPBiz notes that neither article mentioned the Coalition for Patent Fairness.Separately -->In talking about the need to play "legal hardball," a Canadian article talking about a merger between Tri-Vison and Wi-LAN noted:The V-chip, invented by Tri-Vision chairman Tim Collings, is the only solution to the parental controls mandated by… [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 10:38 am
Ohio and NAACP v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 1:03 pm
State Bar of Cal., No. 3:20-cv-06442-LB (N.D. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 3:25 am
Torres v Monroe Coll., 12 AD3d 261, 262, 785 N.Y.S.2d 57 [2004]). [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 2:37 pm
However, if the State were to adopt Model Rule 8.4(g), its provisions raise serious concerns about the constitutionality of the restrictions it would place on members of the State Bar and the resulting harm to the clients they represent. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 6:16 am
Boston Coll. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 3:53 am
Francis Coll., 232 AD2d 629; Howley v Newsday, Inc., 215 AD2d 729, 730; Scheiber v St. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 1:00 am
R (Coll) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 21 Feb 2017. [read post]
