Search for: "Colorado v. United States" Results 141 - 160 of 2,227
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2012, 7:53 pm by Robert Chesney
  The IJU has been designated by the U.S. secretary of state as a foreign terrorist organization. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 9:23 am
As explained by the Appeals Court, this case involves procedural challenges to a United States Forest Service Rule known as the "State Petitions Rule. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 7:28 am by Aurora Barnes
United States 17-5165 Issue: Whether Richardson v. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 7:02 am by Deborah Heller
The case stems from the Rio Grande Compact, signed by New Mexico, Texas, Colorado, and the United States in 1938 to resolve their conflicts over water rights from the river. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Reversing theDistrict Court’s operative holding, the majority concludedthat for purposes of Section 3, the Presidency is an officeunder the United States and the President is an officer ofthe United States. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 6:26 am by Marty Lederman
The argument that the violence at the Capitol on January 6, 2021 did not amount to an insurrection against the United States. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 6:22 pm by Ilya Somin
Worcester ed., 1859) (defining "office" as "a publick charge or employment; magistracy");United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 8:16 am by Keith L. Miller
In the first case, a client retained the attorney to assist her in obtaining legal immigrant status in the United States. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 11:02 am by Florian Mueller
The United States Department of Justice has done today what media reports indicated yesterday: the DOJ, together with the attorneys general (AGs) of eight states (in alphabetical order: California, Colorado, Connecticut, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, Tennessee, and Virginia) filed an antitrust lawsuit over Google's ad tech. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 4:30 am by Frances G. Zacher
" The United States District Court for the District of Colorado was faced with just that question in the recently decided Zapien v. [read post]